Staples presumption in California

5 California opinions name it 1 courts 2006–2026 3 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

Case	Followed	Cited
People v. Magpusogreen calctapp · 1994 · cited in 1 California opinions naming this issue, 2026–2026 1 sentence 2026(Id. at pp. 614–615.) Here, unlike the Staples defendant, Freeman’s acts of kidnapping, sexually assaulting, and raping M would be criminal regardless of his knowledge about her age. 14 Cal.App.4th 784 , 800 [defense not available where, “even if [the victim] had been 16, [defendant] would still be guilty of felony unlawful sexual intercourse”]; People v. Magpuso, supra, 23 Cal.App.4th at p. 118 [defense unavailable where defendant “was committing a criminal act, with criminal intent regardless of her belief as to . . . age”].) Accordingly, we conclude Freeman’s challenge to the sufficiency of	1	1
Searle v. Wyndham International, Inc.green calctapp · 2002 · cited in 1 California opinions naming this issue, 2023–2023 1 sentence 2023(Ibid.) The trial court granted Staples’s motion for summary judgment, and this court affirmed, concluding that “[i]n light of Staples’s clear disclosure of the actual price it would charge its customers for declared value coverage prior to any purchase, the trial court properly concluded any ambiguity in the order form as to whether the amount charged includes a ‘surcharge’ or profit for Staples was not misleading or deceptive.” (Id. at p. 484.) Ready Mix also relies on Searle v. Wyndham International, Inc. (2002) 102 Cal.App.4th 1327, 1334 (Searle), which affirmed a demurrer to plaintiff’s U	1	1
Vance v. Villa Park Mobilehome Estatesgreen calctapp · 1995 · cited in 1 California opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006 2 sentences 2006(Perdue v. Crocker National Bank, supra, 38 Cal.3d at p. 926 ; Vance v. Villa Park Mobilehome Estates (1995) 36 Cal.App.4th 698, 710 [ 42 Cal.Rptr.2d 723 ].) Wayne does not allege any facts, let alone present evidence, suggesting the market for package shipping services is an oligopoly. 6 (Cf. Perdue , at p. 927 [price within the range of general market prices may still be held unconscionable if the market is oligopolistic].) To the contrary, in his opposition to Staples’s motion for summary judgment, Wayne conceded not only that Staples’s charge for declared value coverage was comparable to t 2006(Perdue v. Crocker National Bank, supra, 38 Cal.3d at p. 926 ; Vance v. Villa Park Mobilehome Estates (1995) 36 Cal.App.4th 698, 710 [ 42 Cal.Rptr.2d 723 ].) Wayne does not allege any facts, let alone present evidence, suggesting the market for package shipping services is an oligopoly. 6 (Cf. Perdue , at p. 927 [price within the range of general market prices may still be held unconscionable if the market is oligopolistic].) To the contrary, in his opposition to Staples’s motion for summary judgment, Wayne conceded not only that Staples’s charge for declared value coverage was comparable to t	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (11)

Case	Cited	Years
Posters 'N' Things, Ltd. v. United States green scotus · 1994 2 sentences 2024(See United States v. United States Gypsum Co. (1978) 438 U.S. 422 , 436–438; Liparota v. United States (1985) 471 U.S. 419 , 423–434; Ratzlaf v. United States (1994) 510 U.S. 135, 137 , 140–149; Posters ‘N’ Things, Ltd. v. United States (1994) 511 U.S. 513 , 517–525; United States v. X-Citement Video (1994) 513 U.S. 64 , 69–79; Dean v. United States (2009) 556 U.S. 568 , 574–575; Elonis v. United States (2015) 575 U.S. 723 , 732–740; cf. Counterman v. Colorado (2023) 600 U.S. 66 , 72–82 & fn. 5 (Counterman) [imposing mandatory culpability standard of recklessness on a state statute as a matte 2024(See United States v. United States Gypsum Co. (1978) 438 U.S. 422 , 436–438; Liparota v. United States (1985) 471 U.S. 419 , 423–434; Ratzlaf v. United States (1994) 510 U.S. 135, 137 , 140–149; Posters ‘N’ Things, Ltd. v. United States (1994) 511 U.S. 513 , 517–525; United States v. X-Citement Video (1994) 513 U.S. 64 , 69–79; Dean v. United States (2009) 556 U.S. 568 , 574–575; Elonis v. United States (2015) 575 U.S. 723 , 732–740; cf. Counterman v. Colorado (2023) 600 U.S. 66 , 72–82 & fn. 5 (Counterman) [imposing mandatory culpability standard of recklessness on a state statute as a matte	1	2024–2024
Staples v. United States green scotus · 1994 2 sentences 2024Silence does not suggest that [the Legislature] dispensed with mens rea for the element of [the statute] at issue here.” (Staples, supra, 511 U.S. at p. 619 .) The Staples presumption is fundamental. 2024Silence does not suggest that [the Legislature] dispensed with mens rea for the element of [the statute] at issue here.” (Staples, supra, 511 U.S. at p. 619 .) The Staples presumption is fundamental.	1	2024–2024
Dean v. United States green scotus · 2009 2 sentences 2024(See United States v. United States Gypsum Co. (1978) 438 U.S. 422 , 436–438; Liparota v. United States (1985) 471 U.S. 419 , 423–434; Ratzlaf v. United States (1994) 510 U.S. 135, 137 , 140–149; Posters ‘N’ Things, Ltd. v. United States (1994) 511 U.S. 513 , 517–525; United States v. X-Citement Video (1994) 513 U.S. 64 , 69–79; Dean v. United States (2009) 556 U.S. 568 , 574–575; Elonis v. United States (2015) 575 U.S. 723 , 732–740; cf. Counterman v. Colorado (2023) 600 U.S. 66 , 72–82 & fn. 5 (Counterman) [imposing mandatory culpability standard of recklessness on a state statute as a matte 2024(See United States v. United States Gypsum Co. (1978) 438 U.S. 422 , 436–438; Liparota v. United States (1985) 471 U.S. 419 , 423–434; Ratzlaf v. United States (1994) 510 U.S. 135, 137 , 140–149; Posters ‘N’ Things, Ltd. v. United States (1994) 511 U.S. 513 , 517–525; United States v. X-Citement Video (1994) 513 U.S. 64 , 69–79; Dean v. United States (2009) 556 U.S. 568 , 574–575; Elonis v. United States (2015) 575 U.S. 723 , 732–740; cf. Counterman v. Colorado (2023) 600 U.S. 66 , 72–82 & fn. 5 (Counterman) [imposing mandatory culpability standard of recklessness on a state statute as a matte	1	2024–2024
Ratzlaf v. United States green scotus · 1994 2 sentences 2024(See United States v. United States Gypsum Co. (1978) 438 U.S. 422 , 436–438; Liparota v. United States (1985) 471 U.S. 419 , 423–434; Ratzlaf v. United States (1994) 510 U.S. 135, 137 , 140–149; Posters ‘N’ Things, Ltd. v. United States (1994) 511 U.S. 513 , 517–525; United States v. X-Citement Video (1994) 513 U.S. 64 , 69–79; Dean v. United States (2009) 556 U.S. 568 , 574–575; Elonis v. United States (2015) 575 U.S. 723 , 732–740; cf. Counterman v. Colorado (2023) 600 U.S. 66 , 72–82 & fn. 5 (Counterman) [imposing mandatory culpability standard of recklessness on a state statute as a matte 2024(See United States v. United States Gypsum Co. (1978) 438 U.S. 422 , 436–438; Liparota v. United States (1985) 471 U.S. 419 , 423–434; Ratzlaf v. United States (1994) 510 U.S. 135, 137 , 140–149; Posters ‘N’ Things, Ltd. v. United States (1994) 511 U.S. 513 , 517–525; United States v. X-Citement Video (1994) 513 U.S. 64 , 69–79; Dean v. United States (2009) 556 U.S. 568 , 574–575; Elonis v. United States (2015) 575 U.S. 723 , 732–740; cf. Counterman v. Colorado (2023) 600 U.S. 66 , 72–82 & fn. 5 (Counterman) [imposing mandatory culpability standard of recklessness on a state statute as a matte	1	2024–2024
United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc. green scotus · 1994 2 sentences 2024(See United States v. United States Gypsum Co. (1978) 438 U.S. 422 , 436–438; Liparota v. United States (1985) 471 U.S. 419 , 423–434; Ratzlaf v. United States (1994) 510 U.S. 135, 137 , 140–149; Posters ‘N’ Things, Ltd. v. United States (1994) 511 U.S. 513 , 517–525; United States v. X-Citement Video (1994) 513 U.S. 64 , 69–79; Dean v. United States (2009) 556 U.S. 568 , 574–575; Elonis v. United States (2015) 575 U.S. 723 , 732–740; cf. Counterman v. Colorado (2023) 600 U.S. 66 , 72–82 & fn. 5 (Counterman) [imposing mandatory culpability standard of recklessness on a state statute as a matte 2024(See United States v. United States Gypsum Co. (1978) 438 U.S. 422 , 436–438; Liparota v. United States (1985) 471 U.S. 419 , 423–434; Ratzlaf v. United States (1994) 510 U.S. 135, 137 , 140–149; Posters ‘N’ Things, Ltd. v. United States (1994) 511 U.S. 513 , 517–525; United States v. X-Citement Video (1994) 513 U.S. 64 , 69–79; Dean v. United States (2009) 556 U.S. 568 , 574–575; Elonis v. United States (2015) 575 U.S. 723 , 732–740; cf. Counterman v. Colorado (2023) 600 U.S. 66 , 72–82 & fn. 5 (Counterman) [imposing mandatory culpability standard of recklessness on a state statute as a matte	1	2024–2024
Counterman v. Colorado green scotus · 2023 2 sentences 2024(See United States v. United States Gypsum Co. (1978) 438 U.S. 422 , 436–438; Liparota v. United States (1985) 471 U.S. 419 , 423–434; Ratzlaf v. United States (1994) 510 U.S. 135, 137 , 140–149; Posters ‘N’ Things, Ltd. v. United States (1994) 511 U.S. 513 , 517–525; United States v. X-Citement Video (1994) 513 U.S. 64 , 69–79; Dean v. United States (2009) 556 U.S. 568 , 574–575; Elonis v. United States (2015) 575 U.S. 723 , 732–740; cf. Counterman v. Colorado (2023) 600 U.S. 66 , 72–82 & fn. 5 (Counterman) [imposing mandatory culpability standard of recklessness on a state statute as a matte 2024(See United States v. United States Gypsum Co. (1978) 438 U.S. 422 , 436–438; Liparota v. United States (1985) 471 U.S. 419 , 423–434; Ratzlaf v. United States (1994) 510 U.S. 135, 137 , 140–149; Posters ‘N’ Things, Ltd. v. United States (1994) 511 U.S. 513 , 517–525; United States v. X-Citement Video (1994) 513 U.S. 64 , 69–79; Dean v. United States (2009) 556 U.S. 568 , 574–575; Elonis v. United States (2015) 575 U.S. 723 , 732–740; cf. Counterman v. Colorado (2023) 600 U.S. 66 , 72–82 & fn. 5 (Counterman) [imposing mandatory culpability standard of recklessness on a state statute as a matte	1	2024–2024
United States v. United States Gypsum Co. green scotus · 1978 2 sentences 2024(See United States v. United States Gypsum Co. (1978) 438 U.S. 422 , 436–438; Liparota v. United States (1985) 471 U.S. 419 , 423–434; Ratzlaf v. United States (1994) 510 U.S. 135, 137 , 140–149; Posters ‘N’ Things, Ltd. v. United States (1994) 511 U.S. 513 , 517–525; United States v. X-Citement Video (1994) 513 U.S. 64 , 69–79; Dean v. United States (2009) 556 U.S. 568 , 574–575; Elonis v. United States (2015) 575 U.S. 723 , 732–740; cf. Counterman v. Colorado (2023) 600 U.S. 66 , 72–82 & fn. 5 (Counterman) [imposing mandatory culpability standard of recklessness on a state statute as a matte 2024(See United States v. United States Gypsum Co. (1978) 438 U.S. 422 , 436–438; Liparota v. United States (1985) 471 U.S. 419 , 423–434; Ratzlaf v. United States (1994) 510 U.S. 135, 137 , 140–149; Posters ‘N’ Things, Ltd. v. United States (1994) 511 U.S. 513 , 517–525; United States v. X-Citement Video (1994) 513 U.S. 64 , 69–79; Dean v. United States (2009) 556 U.S. 568 , 574–575; Elonis v. United States (2015) 575 U.S. 723 , 732–740; cf. Counterman v. Colorado (2023) 600 U.S. 66 , 72–82 & fn. 5 (Counterman) [imposing mandatory culpability standard of recklessness on a state statute as a matte	1	2024–2024
Liparota v. United States green scotus · 1985 2 sentences 2024(See United States v. United States Gypsum Co. (1978) 438 U.S. 422 , 436–438; Liparota v. United States (1985) 471 U.S. 419 , 423–434; Ratzlaf v. United States (1994) 510 U.S. 135, 137 , 140–149; Posters ‘N’ Things, Ltd. v. United States (1994) 511 U.S. 513 , 517–525; United States v. X-Citement Video (1994) 513 U.S. 64 , 69–79; Dean v. United States (2009) 556 U.S. 568 , 574–575; Elonis v. United States (2015) 575 U.S. 723 , 732–740; cf. Counterman v. Colorado (2023) 600 U.S. 66 , 72–82 & fn. 5 (Counterman) [imposing mandatory culpability standard of recklessness on a state statute as a matte 2024(See United States v. United States Gypsum Co. (1978) 438 U.S. 422 , 436–438; Liparota v. United States (1985) 471 U.S. 419 , 423–434; Ratzlaf v. United States (1994) 510 U.S. 135, 137 , 140–149; Posters ‘N’ Things, Ltd. v. United States (1994) 511 U.S. 513 , 517–525; United States v. X-Citement Video (1994) 513 U.S. 64 , 69–79; Dean v. United States (2009) 556 U.S. 568 , 574–575; Elonis v. United States (2015) 575 U.S. 723 , 732–740; cf. Counterman v. Colorado (2023) 600 U.S. 66 , 72–82 & fn. 5 (Counterman) [imposing mandatory culpability standard of recklessness on a state statute as a matte	1	2024–2024
Elonis v. United States green scotus · 2015 2 sentences 2024(See United States v. United States Gypsum Co. (1978) 438 U.S. 422 , 436–438; Liparota v. United States (1985) 471 U.S. 419 , 423–434; Ratzlaf v. United States (1994) 510 U.S. 135, 137 , 140–149; Posters ‘N’ Things, Ltd. v. United States (1994) 511 U.S. 513 , 517–525; United States v. X-Citement Video (1994) 513 U.S. 64 , 69–79; Dean v. United States (2009) 556 U.S. 568 , 574–575; Elonis v. United States (2015) 575 U.S. 723 , 732–740; cf. Counterman v. Colorado (2023) 600 U.S. 66 , 72–82 & fn. 5 (Counterman) [imposing mandatory culpability standard of recklessness on a state statute as a matte 2024(See United States v. United States Gypsum Co. (1978) 438 U.S. 422 , 436–438; Liparota v. United States (1985) 471 U.S. 419 , 423–434; Ratzlaf v. United States (1994) 510 U.S. 135, 137 , 140–149; Posters ‘N’ Things, Ltd. v. United States (1994) 511 U.S. 513 , 517–525; United States v. X-Citement Video (1994) 513 U.S. 64 , 69–79; Dean v. United States (2009) 556 U.S. 568 , 574–575; Elonis v. United States (2015) 575 U.S. 723 , 732–740; cf. Counterman v. Colorado (2023) 600 U.S. 66 , 72–82 & fn. 5 (Counterman) [imposing mandatory culpability standard of recklessness on a state statute as a matte	1	2024–2024
Batze v. Safeway, Inc. green calctapp · 2017 1 sentence 2020Relying on Batze v. Safeway, Inc. (2017) 10 Cal.App.5th 440 (Batze), the court determined the denial of class certification in Wesson due to lack of commonality gave rise to a “presumption” against tolling.	1	2020–2020
Perdue v. Crocker National Bank green cal · 1985 1 sentence 2006(Perdue v. Crocker National Bank, supra, 38 Cal.3d at p. 926 ; Vance v. Villa Park Mobilehome Estates (1995) 36 Cal.App.4th 698, 710 [ 42 Cal.Rptr.2d 723 ].) Wayne does not allege any facts, let alone present evidence, suggesting the market for package shipping services is an oligopoly. 6 (Cf. Perdue , at p. 927 [price within the range of general market prices may still be held unconscionable if the market is oligopolistic].) To the contrary, in his opposition to Staples’s motion for summary judgment, Wayne conceded not only that Staples’s charge for declared value coverage was comparable to t	1	2006–2006

Where else courts name it

CA 5 (2006–2026) AL 2 (1922–2007)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check