5 California opinions name it 2 courts 2016–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Serrano v. Priestgreen2 sentences2016A statute is facially unconstitutional when the constitutional violation flows "inevitably" from the statute, not the actions of the people implementing it. ( Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168 , 180-181, 172 Cal.Rptr. 487 , 624 P.2d 1215 ; Arcadia Unified , supra , 2 Cal.4th 251 , 267, 5 Cal.Rptr.2d 545 , 825 P.2d 438 .) This can occur when (1) the text of the statute mandates the constitutional violation (see Serrano I , supra , 5 Cal.3d 584 , 603, 96 Cal.Rptr. 601 , 487 P.2d 1241 [noting how the unequal "school funding scheme is mandated in every detail by the California 2016A statute is facially unconstitutional when the constitutional violation flows "inevitably" from the statute, not the actions of the people implementing it. ( Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168 , 180-181, 172 Cal.Rptr. 487 , 624 P.2d 1215 ; Arcadia Unified , supra , 2 Cal.4th 251 , 267, 5 Cal.Rptr.2d 545 , 825 P.2d 438 .) This can occur when (1) the text of the statute mandates the constitutional violation (see Serrano I , supra , 5 Cal.3d 584 , 603, 96 Cal.Rptr. 601 , 487 P.2d 1241 [noting how the unequal "school funding scheme is mandated in every detail by the California | 3 | 4 |
Serrano v. Priestgreen2 sentences2016A statute is facially unconstitutional when the constitutional violation flows "inevitably" from the statute, not the actions of the people implementing it. ( Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168 , 180-181, 172 Cal.Rptr. 487 , 624 P.2d 1215 ; Arcadia Unified , supra , 2 Cal.4th 251 , 267, 5 Cal.Rptr.2d 545 , 825 P.2d 438 .) This can occur when (1) the text of the statute mandates the constitutional violation (see Serrano I , supra , 5 Cal.3d 584 , 603, 96 Cal.Rptr. 601 , 487 P.2d 1241 [noting how the unequal "school funding scheme is mandated in every detail by the California 2016A statute is facially unconstitutional when the constitutional violation flows "inevitably" from the statute, not the actions of the people implementing it. ( Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168 , 180-181, 172 Cal.Rptr. 487 , 624 P.2d 1215 ; Arcadia Unified , supra , 2 Cal.4th 251 , 267, 5 Cal.Rptr.2d 545 , 825 P.2d 438 .) This can occur when (1) the text of the statute mandates the constitutional violation (see Serrano I , supra , 5 Cal.3d 584 , 603, 96 Cal.Rptr. 601 , 487 P.2d 1241 [noting how the unequal "school funding scheme is mandated in every detail by the California | 3 | 4 |
Sanchez v. State of Californiagreen2 sentences2016A statute is facially unconstitutional when the constitutional violation flows "inevitably" from the statute, not the actions of the people implementing it. ( Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168 , 180-181, 172 Cal.Rptr. 487 , 624 P.2d 1215 ; Arcadia Unified , supra , 2 Cal.4th 251 , 267, 5 Cal.Rptr.2d 545 , 825 P.2d 438 .) This can occur when (1) the text of the statute mandates the constitutional violation (see Serrano I , supra , 5 Cal.3d 584 , 603, 96 Cal.Rptr. 601 , 487 P.2d 1241 [noting how the unequal "school funding scheme is mandated in every detail by the California 2016A statute is facially unconstitutional when the constitutional violation flows "inevitably" from the statute, not the actions of the people implementing it. ( Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168 , 180-181, 172 Cal.Rptr. 487 , 624 P.2d 1215 ; Arcadia Unified , supra , 2 Cal.4th 251 , 267, 5 Cal.Rptr.2d 545 , 825 P.2d 438 .) This can occur when (1) the text of the statute mandates the constitutional violation (see Serrano I , supra , 5 Cal.3d 584 , 603, 96 Cal.Rptr. 601 , 487 P.2d 1241 [noting how the unequal "school funding scheme is mandated in every detail by the California | 3 | 4 |
Pacific Legal Foundation v. Browngreen2 sentences2024(Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168, 180-181 .) “This can occur when (1) the text of the statute mandates the constitutional violation . . . or (2) the constitutional violation, while not mandated by the statute’s text, ‘inevitably’ flows from the statute regardless of the actions of those administering it . . . .” ( Vergara, supra, 246 Cal.App.4th at pp. 648-649.) The challenged statutes here do not inevitably deprive teachers of their due process rights by not “abid[ing] by the 5 In its order sustaining defendants’ demurrer to the SAC, the trial court analyzed plaintiffs’ 2016A statute is facially unconstitutional when the constitutional violation flows "inevitably" from the statute, not the actions of the people implementing it. ( Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168 , 180-181, 172 Cal.Rptr. 487 , 624 P.2d 1215 ; Arcadia Unified , supra , 2 Cal.4th 251 , 267, 5 Cal.Rptr.2d 545 , 825 P.2d 438 .) This can occur when (1) the text of the statute mandates the constitutional violation (see Serrano I , supra , 5 Cal.3d 584 , 603, 96 Cal.Rptr. 601 , 487 P.2d 1241 [noting how the unequal "school funding scheme is mandated in every detail by the California | 1 | 5 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Arcadia Unified School District v. State Department of Education
green
2 sentences2016A statute is facially unconstitutional when the constitutional violation flows "inevitably" from the statute, not the actions of the people implementing it. ( Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168 , 180-181, 172 Cal.Rptr. 487 , 624 P.2d 1215 ; Arcadia Unified , supra , 2 Cal.4th 251 , 267, 5 Cal.Rptr.2d 545 , 825 P.2d 438 .) This can occur when (1) the text of the statute mandates the constitutional violation (see Serrano I , supra , 5 Cal.3d 584 , 603, 96 Cal.Rptr. 601 , 487 P.2d 1241 [noting how the unequal "school funding scheme is mandated in every detail by the California 2016A statute is facially unconstitutional when the constitutional violation flows "inevitably" from the statute, not the actions of the people implementing it. ( Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168 , 180-181, 172 Cal.Rptr. 487 , 624 P.2d 1215 ; Arcadia Unified , supra , 2 Cal.4th 251 , 267, 5 Cal.Rptr.2d 545 , 825 P.2d 438 .) This can occur when (1) the text of the statute mandates the constitutional violation (see Serrano I , supra , 5 Cal.3d 584 , 603, 96 Cal.Rptr. 601 , 487 P.2d 1241 [noting how the unequal "school funding scheme is mandated in every detail by the California | 4 | 2016–2016 |
Crawford v. Board of Education
green
2 sentences2016(See Crawford v. Board of Education (1976) 17 Cal.3d 280, 297 ; Hardy, supra, 21 Cal.3d 1, 7-8 .) 31 Legal Foundation v. Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168, 180-181 ; Arcadia Unified, supra, 2 Cal.4th 251, 267 .) This can occur when (1) the text of the statute mandates the constitutional violation (see Serrano I, supra, 5 Cal.3d 584, 603 [noting how the unequal ―school funding scheme is mandated in every detail by the California Constitution and statutes‖]); or (2) the constitutional violation, while not mandated by the statute‘s text, ―inevitably‖ flows from the statute regardless of the actions of t 2016(See Crawford v. Board of Education (1976) 17 Cal.3d 280, 297 ; Hardy, supra, 21 Cal.3d 1, 7-8 .) 31 Legal Foundation v. Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168, 180-181 ; Arcadia Unified, supra, 2 Cal.4th 251, 267 .) This can occur when (1) the text of the statute mandates the constitutional violation (see Serrano I, supra, 5 Cal.3d 584, 603 [noting how the unequal “school funding scheme is mandated in every detail by the California Constitution and statutes”]); or (2) the constitutional violation, while not mandated by the statute’s text, “inevitably” flows from the statute regardless of the actions of t | 2 | 2016–2016 |
Hardy v. Stumpf
green
2 sentences2016(See Crawford v. Board of Education (1976) 17 Cal.3d 280, 297 ; Hardy, supra, 21 Cal.3d 1, 7-8 .) 31 Legal Foundation v. Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168, 180-181 ; Arcadia Unified, supra, 2 Cal.4th 251, 267 .) This can occur when (1) the text of the statute mandates the constitutional violation (see Serrano I, supra, 5 Cal.3d 584, 603 [noting how the unequal ―school funding scheme is mandated in every detail by the California Constitution and statutes‖]); or (2) the constitutional violation, while not mandated by the statute‘s text, ―inevitably‖ flows from the statute regardless of the actions of t 2016(See Crawford v. Board of Education (1976) 17 Cal.3d 280, 297 ; Hardy, supra, 21 Cal.3d 1, 7-8 .) 31 Legal Foundation v. Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168, 180-181 ; Arcadia Unified, supra, 2 Cal.4th 251, 267 .) This can occur when (1) the text of the statute mandates the constitutional violation (see Serrano I, supra, 5 Cal.3d 584, 603 [noting how the unequal ―school funding scheme is mandated in every detail by the California Constitution and statutes‖]); or (2) the constitutional violation, while not mandated by the statute‘s text, ―inevitably‖ flows from the statute regardless of the actions of t | 2 | 2016–2016 |
Vergara v. State of California
green
1 sentence2024(Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168, 180-181 .) “This can occur when (1) the text of the statute mandates the constitutional violation . . . or (2) the constitutional violation, while not mandated by the statute’s text, ‘inevitably’ flows from the statute regardless of the actions of those administering it . . . .” ( Vergara, supra, 246 Cal.App.4th at pp. 648-649.) The challenged statutes here do not inevitably deprive teachers of their due process rights by not “abid[ing] by the 5 In its order sustaining defendants’ demurrer to the SAC, the trial court analyzed plaintiffs’ | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.