5 California opinions name it 2 courts 2018–2023 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Bentongreen1 sentence2023(See People v. Benton (1979) 100 Cal.App.3d 92, 97 [excluding any reference to defendant’s “convictions would have given his testimony a false aura of veracity”].) Ultimately defendant’s testimony on this issue was limited to the fact that he pleaded no contest to receiving stolen property in 2020 for a crime that occurred in 2017, without disclosing any facts regarding the crime. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Clarkgreen1 sentence2022Evidence Code section 352 states that a trial court has the discretion to “exclude evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the probability that its admission will (a) necessitate undue consumption of time or (b) create substantial danger of undue prejudice, of confusing the issues, or of misleading the jury.” Evidence Code section 356 states: “Where part of an act, declaration, conversation, or writing is given in evidence by one party, the whole on the same subject may be inquired into by an adverse party; when a letter is read, the answer may be given; and when a detac | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Perdue v. Crocker National Bank
green
2 sentences2023(See Perdue v. Crocker National Bank (1985) 38 Cal.3d 913, 922 .) As for defendants’ second argument, we agree that the bucketing analysis does not identify specific VRDOs for which Edelweiss alleges the 24 interest rate was too high. 2023(See Perdue v. Crocker National Bank (1985) 38 Cal.3d 913, 922 .) As for defendants’ second argument, we agree that the bucketing analysis does not identify specific VRDOs for which Edelweiss alleges the 24 interest rate was too high. | 2 | 2023–2023 |
Doe v. Regents of the University of California
green
2 sentences2018(Id. at pp. 248, 253.) Regents is the second and, as far as we have discovered, the only other California case addressing whether a fair hearing includes the ability of a student accused of sexual misconduct to question the complaining witness.8 In Regents, the university held a hearing at which both the accused student and the complaining witness appeared, although they were separated by a screen and could not see one another. ( Regents, supra, 5 Cal.App.5th at pp. 1081, 1093.) The university’s procedures allowed the parties to “provide written questions to the review panel chair or review of 2018(Id. at pp. 248, 253.) Regents is the second and, as far as we have discovered, the only other California case addressing whether a fair hearing includes the ability of a student accused of sexual misconduct to question the complaining witness.8 In Regents, the university held a hearing at which both the accused student and the complaining witness appeared, although they were separated by a screen and could not see one another. ( Regents, supra, 5 Cal.App.5th at pp. 1081, 1093.) The university’s procedures allowed the parties to “provide written questions to the review panel chair or review of | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.