5 Connecticut opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2007 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Wsol v. Fiduciary Management Associates, Inc.green2 sentences2007See, e.g., Estate of Branson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 264 F.3d 904, 910 (9th Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 927 , 122 S. Ct. 1296 , 152 L. 2007See, e.g., Estate of Branson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 264 F.3d 904, 910 (9th Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 927 , 122 S. Ct. 1296 , 152 L. | 1 | 1 |
Electric Motor & Supply, Inc. v. Potomac Electric Power Cogreen1 sentence2007See, e.g., Estate of Branson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 264 F.3d 904, 910 (9th Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 927 , 122 S. Ct. 1296 , 152 L. | 1 | 1 |
Estate of Frank Branson, Deceased Mary M. March v. Commissioner of Internal Revenuegreen1 sentence2007See, e.g., Estate of Branson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 264 F.3d 904, 910 (9th Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 927 , 122 S. Ct. 1296 , 152 L. | 1 | 1 |
Jewett City Trust Co. v. Graygreen2 sentences1993See Jewitt City Trust Co. v. Grey, 35 Conn. Sup. 508 , 390 A.2d 948 (1977). 1993See Jewitt City Trust Co. v. Grey, 35 Conn. Sup. 508 , 390 A.2d 948 (1977). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Nickerson v. Martin
green
2 sentences1999Although a defendant should clearly claim recoupment by special defense, and caption its allegations "by way of recoupment only," see Nickerson v. Martin , 34 Conn. Sup. 22 , 30 , 374 A.2d 258 (1976), a counterclaim is sufficient as long as the counterclaim "is within the recoupment exception," and arises out of the plaintiff's main cause of action. 1999Although a defendant should clearly claim recoupment by special defense, and caption its allegations "by way of recoupment only," see Nickerson v. Martin , 34 Conn. Sup. 22 , 30 , 374 A.2d 258 (1976), a counterclaim is sufficient as long as the counterclaim "is within the recoupment exception," and arises out of the plaintiff's main cause of action. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Capitol Coal Co. v. Greenberg
neutral
2 sentences1998Furthermore, the defendant has properly asserted the recoupment claim as a defense and counterclaim, for it has been held that "[u]nder our present practice, recoupment is to bed pleaded as a counterclaim and requires a prayer for affirmative relief . . ." Capitol Coal Co. v. Greenberg , 114 Conn. 422 , 424 , 158 A. 883 (1932). 1998Furthermore, the defendant has properly asserted the recoupment claim as a defense and counterclaim, for it has been held that "[u]nder our present practice, recoupment is to bed pleaded as a counterclaim and requires a prayer for affirmative relief . . ." Capitol Coal Co. v. Greenberg , 114 Conn. 422 , 424 , 158 A. 883 (1932). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Sigel v. Gordon
green
1 sentence1994In Connecticut long-standing law has held that the debt sought be set off had to be liquidated Palmer v. Green , 6 Conn. 14 , 19 (1825), Lippitt v. Thames Loan Trust Co. , 117 Conn. 271 , 280 (1933). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Palmer v. Green
green
1 sentence1994In Connecticut long-standing law has held that the debt sought be set off had to be liquidated Palmer v. Green , 6 Conn. 14 , 19 (1825), Lippitt v. Thames Loan Trust Co. , 117 Conn. 271 , 280 (1933). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
First State Bank of Crossett v. Phillips
green
2 sentences1993App. 157 , 681 S.W.2d 408 , 410 (1984), where the court did not specifically state that a foreclosure action was an action to collect a debt, but allowed the recoupment defense, this court will allow the recoupment defense in foreclosure actions. 1993However, in the present case, and in virtually all foreclosure actions, the mortgagee seeks a deficiency judgment; therefore, as in First State Bank v. Phillips, 13 Ark. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.