5 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1979–2007 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
AIU Ins. Co. v. Block Marina Inv., Inc.green1 sentence2000See id. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Johnsongreen1 sentence1992See Johnson v. State, 460 So.2d 954 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984), approved, 483 So.2d 420 (Fla. 1986). [5] The actions of defense counsel in "consenting" to the State's motion to withdraw the defendant's plea to accessory with knowledge that the State intended to file a more serious criminal offense constitutes a prima facie case of ineffective assistance of counsel. | 1 | 1 |
Johnson v. Stategreen1 sentence1992See Johnson v. State, 460 So.2d 954 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984), approved, 483 So.2d 420 (Fla. 1986). [5] The actions of defense counsel in "consenting" to the State's motion to withdraw the defendant's plea to accessory with knowledge that the State intended to file a more serious criminal offense constitutes a prima facie case of ineffective assistance of counsel. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bradley v. Brotman
green
1 sentence2007The Fourth District opinion also commented on Cocalis’s lack of professionalism in the underlying proceedings, stating, “[W]e condemn the actions of defense counsel as to both the contact with Dr. Bernhardt and the strategic concealment of Dr. Unis’ records.” Id. at 1136 . | 1 | 2007–2007 |
McNamara v. State
green
1 sentence1998We note that decisions of a trial court in considering a motion to suppress come to an appellate court clothed with a presumption of correctness, McNamara v. State, 357 So.2d 410 (Fla.1978), and a reviewing court will interpret the evidence and reasonable inferences derived therefrom in a manner most favorable to such a ruling. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Saucer v. City of West Palm Beach
green
2 sentences1979Neither Gallub nor Salvador cited Saucer v. City of West Palm Beach, 155 Fla. 659 , 21 So.2d 452 (Fla. 1945), where the court held, without reciting facts of the case: "If the doctors who treated appellant do not say there is any permanent injury, the jury composed of laymen could certainly not be expected to say there was such injuries... ." 21 So.2d at 455 . 1979Neither Gallub nor Salvador cited Saucer v. City of West Palm Beach, 155 Fla. 659 , 21 So.2d 452 (Fla. 1945), where the court held, without reciting facts of the case: "If the doctors who treated appellant do not say there is any permanent injury, the jury composed of laymen could certainly not be expected to say there was such injuries... ." 21 So.2d at 455 . | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Salvador v. Munoz
neutral
1 sentence1979None of the trial court's actions was error, the Third District concluded, since the jury was instructed on the possible permanency of the plaintiff's injuries, and since "[t]he plaintiff's own testimony respecting his permanent injury was sufficient to justify a charge ... upon that issue." Id. at 786-787 . | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.