Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Utah opinions name it 2 courts 1988–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Utah courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Hallgreen2 sentences2011See id. at 159 (considering the actions of defense counsel to determine whether counsel's failure to object was part of the trial strategy); State v. Hall, 946 P.2d 712, 717 (Utah Ct.App.1997) (finding defense counsel had allowed objectionable testimony as part of trial strategy). 2011See id. at 159 (considering the actions of defense counsel to determine whether counsel's failure to object was part of the trial strategy); State v. Hall, 946 P.2d 712, 717 (Utah Ct.App.1997) (finding defense counsel had allowed objectionable testimony as part of trial strategy). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Bullockgreen2 sentences2011See id. at 159 (considering the actions of defense counsel to determine whether counsel's failure to object was part of the trial strategy); State v. Hall, 946 P.2d 712, 717 (Utah Ct.App.1997) (finding defense counsel had allowed objectionable testimony as part of trial strategy). 2011See id. at 159 (considering the actions of defense counsel to determine whether counsel's failure to object was part of the trial strategy); State v. Hall, 946 P.2d 712, 717 (Utah Ct.App.1997) (finding defense counsel had allowed objectionable testimony as part of trial strategy). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Alvarezgreen1 sentence1999See State v. Alvarez, 872 P.2d 450, 460-61 (Utah 1994). *559 ¶ 14 The events surrounding the entry of Benvenuto’s guilty plea and the actions of his defense team strongly support the court’s ruling. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Utah. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Knight
green
2 sentences2014"The record cannot reveal how knowledge of this evidence would have affected the actions of defense counsel, either in preparing for trial or in presenting the case to the jury." Id. 1988First, as in Knight , the record “cannot reveal how [adequate notice of the charges] would have affected the actions of defense counsel, either in preparing for trial or in presenting the case to the jury.” Id. at 920 . | 2 | 1988–2014 |
Smith v. Simas
neutral
1 sentence2019However, “because the application of this doctrine is reserved for the innocent defendant, the determination whether the defendant’s violation was innocent is a threshold issue.” Id. (quotation simplified). ¶45 In Smith, we specifically considered whether the defendants’ violations of the relevant restrictive covenants were innocent where the defendants were aware that the plaintiffs believed that the defendants’ actions were in violation of the covenants, and that the plaintiffs had complained to the city and the relevant homeowners association (HOA). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Smith v. Robbins
green
2 sentences2005Had the Amended Petition we reviewed today complied with the requirements set forth herein, it, along with the court's actions under rule 58, would have been sufficient under Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S, 259, 120 S.Ct. 746 , 145 L.Ed.2d 756 (2000). 2005Had the Amended Petition we reviewed today complied with the requirements set forth herein, it, along with the court's actions under rule 58, would have been sufficient under Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S, 259, 120 S.Ct. 746 , 145 L.Ed.2d 756 (2000). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.