count alleging violation in Florida

5 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1982–2017 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

Case	Followed	Cited
Cheri Surloff, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Dr. Arthur B. Surloff, etc. v. Regions Bank and Mark K. Andersongreen fladistctapp · 2015 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016 1 sentence 2016Id.; see also Surloff v. Regions Bank, 179 So.3d 472, 476 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (noting that, there is no liability for another’s suicide unless a special duty of care is assumed by taking care and custody of the person). 2 As to the count alleging a violation of section 415.1111, Florida Statutes (2010), we agree with appellees that Chapter 415 does not apply in this instance.	1	1
Ninth Liberty Loan Corp. v. Hardygreen illappct · 1977 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 1982–1982 2 sentences 1982If the remedies are not duplicitous, Ninth Liberty Loan Corp. v. Hardy, 53 Ill.App.3d 601 , 11 Ill.Dec. 363, 367 , 368 N.E.2d 971, 975 (1977), a plaintiff may recover under both a count alleging a violation of the Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act and a count alleging a violation of the federal Truth in Lending Act. 15 U.S.C.A. § 1610 (a); Dryden v. Lou Budke’s Arrow Finance Co., 630 F.2d 641 (8th Cir. 1980); Ballew v. Associates Financial Services Co. of Nebraska, Inc., 450 F.Supp. 253, 272 (D.Neb.1976); Public Finance Corp. v. Riddle, 83 Ill.App.3d 417 , 38 Ill.Dec. 712, 716 , 403 N.E 1982If the remedies are not duplicitous, Ninth Liberty Loan Corp. v. Hardy, 53 Ill.App.3d 601 , 11 Ill.Dec. 363, 367 , 368 N.E.2d 971, 975 (1977), a plaintiff may recover under both a count alleging a violation of the Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act and a count alleging a violation of the federal Truth in Lending Act. 15 U.S.C.A. § 1610 (a); Dryden v. Lou Budke’s Arrow Finance Co., 630 F.2d 641 (8th Cir. 1980); Ballew v. Associates Financial Services Co. of Nebraska, Inc., 450 F.Supp. 253, 272 (D.Neb.1976); Public Finance Corp. v. Riddle, 83 Ill.App.3d 417 , 38 Ill.Dec. 712, 716 , 403 N.E	1	1
Public Finance Corp. v. Riddlegreen illappct · 1980 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 1982–1982 2 sentences 1982If the remedies are not duplicitous, Ninth Liberty Loan Corp. v. Hardy, 53 Ill.App.3d 601 , 11 Ill.Dec. 363, 367 , 368 N.E.2d 971, 975 (1977), a plaintiff may recover under both a count alleging a violation of the Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act and a count alleging a violation of the federal Truth in Lending Act. 15 U.S.C.A. § 1610 (a); Dryden v. Lou Budke’s Arrow Finance Co., 630 F.2d 641 (8th Cir. 1980); Ballew v. Associates Financial Services Co. of Nebraska, Inc., 450 F.Supp. 253, 272 (D.Neb.1976); Public Finance Corp. v. Riddle, 83 Ill.App.3d 417 , 38 Ill.Dec. 712, 716 , 403 N.E 1982If the remedies are not duplicitous, Ninth Liberty Loan Corp. v. Hardy, 53 Ill.App.3d 601 , 11 Ill.Dec. 363, 367 , 368 N.E.2d 971, 975 (1977), a plaintiff may recover under both a count alleging a violation of the Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act and a count alleging a violation of the federal Truth in Lending Act. 15 U.S.C.A. § 1610 (a); Dryden v. Lou Budke’s Arrow Finance Co., 630 F.2d 641 (8th Cir. 1980); Ballew v. Associates Financial Services Co. of Nebraska, Inc., 450 F.Supp. 253, 272 (D.Neb.1976); Public Finance Corp. v. Riddle, 83 Ill.App.3d 417 , 38 Ill.Dec. 712, 716 , 403 N.E	1	1
Ballew v. Associates Fin. Ser. Co. of Neb., Inc.green ned · 1976 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 1982–1982 1 sentence 1982If the remedies are not duplicitous, Ninth Liberty Loan Corp. v. Hardy, 53 Ill.App.3d 601 , 11 Ill.Dec. 363, 367 , 368 N.E.2d 971, 975 (1977), a plaintiff may recover under both a count alleging a violation of the Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act and a count alleging a violation of the federal Truth in Lending Act. 15 U.S.C.A. § 1610 (a); Dryden v. Lou Budke’s Arrow Finance Co., 630 F.2d 641 (8th Cir. 1980); Ballew v. Associates Financial Services Co. of Nebraska, Inc., 450 F.Supp. 253, 272 (D.Neb.1976); Public Finance Corp. v. Riddle, 83 Ill.App.3d 417 , 38 Ill.Dec. 712, 716 , 403 N.E	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

Case	Cited	Years
Johnson v. Davis green fla · 1985 1 sentence 2017Counsel for the Association also clearly represented to the trial court, and in the Association’s brief in this court, that the Association was not proceeding under a buyer’s cause of action for fraudulent nondisclosure as provided in Johnson v. Davis, 480 So. 2d 625 (Fla. 1985), since the Association was not a buyer, the individual unit owners were.	1	2017–2017
Bradenton Group, Inc. v. Dept. of Legal Affairs green fladistctapp · 1997 1 sentence 2001Application of the Bingo Statute In count II of its complaint, the State alleged that 3B TV violated the bingo statute, section 849.0931, Florida Statutes (1997), when it broadcast and operated Basil Basset Bingo in Florida. 3B TV moved for partial summary judgment on count II, arguing that the bingo statute applied only to entities authorized to conduct bingo in Florida under the statute, that 3B TV was not an organization authorized to conduct bingo under the statute, and, thus, that 3B TV cannot fall within the purview of the statute. 3B TV relied upon Bradenton I, 701 So.2d 1170 . *747 The	1	2001–2001
DEPT. of LEGAL AFFAIRS v. Bradenton Group green fla · 1998 1 sentence 2001We agree with the state's argument on cross-appeal that, under the Supreme Court's recent decision in Department of Legal Affairs v. Bradenton Group, Inc., 727 So.2d 199 (Fla. 1998) ( Bradenton II ), the trial court erred in granting partial summary judgment in favor of 3B TV on the count alleging a violation of the bingo statute, section 849.0931, Florida Statutes.	1	2001–2001
Encompass Inc. v. Alford green fladistctapp · 1984 1 sentence 1989The trial court denied the motion on the authority of Encompass, Inc. v. Alford, 444 So.2d 1085 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984), rev. den. 453 So.2d 43 (Fla.1984) in which this court held that although an offer of judgment, silent as to attorney’s fees, does not preclude subsequent recovery of statutorily authorized fees, the plaintiff/offeree was not a prevailing party under that statute, and fees were properly denied. 3 Like wise, in the instant case, the trial court found that appellant was not a prevailing party under section 400.023 because the count alleging violation of that statute was one of thre	1	1989–1989
Hilda Dryden v. Lou Budke's Arrow Finance Company green ca8 · 1980 1 sentence 1982If the remedies are not duplicitous, Ninth Liberty Loan Corp. v. Hardy, 53 Ill.App.3d 601 , 11 Ill.Dec. 363, 367 , 368 N.E.2d 971, 975 (1977), a plaintiff may recover under both a count alleging a violation of the Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act and a count alleging a violation of the federal Truth in Lending Act. 15 U.S.C.A. § 1610 (a); Dryden v. Lou Budke’s Arrow Finance Co., 630 F.2d 641 (8th Cir. 1980); Ballew v. Associates Financial Services Co. of Nebraska, Inc., 450 F.Supp. 253, 272 (D.Neb.1976); Public Finance Corp. v. Riddle, 83 Ill.App.3d 417 , 38 Ill.Dec. 712, 716 , 403 N.E	1	1982–1982

Where else courts name it

CA 8 (1937–2025) FL 5 (1982–2017) CT 3 (1952–1997) AL 2 (1997–1997) NY 2 (1985–2019) IL 2 (1988–1990) MD 2 (1992–2000)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check