5 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1963–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Armstrong v. Stategreen1 sentence2024See Armstrong v. State, 579 So. 2d 734, 735 (Fla. 1991) (holding that by affirmatively requesting an abbreviated instruction on excusable homicide, which the trial court gave, the defendant waived any claim of error in the instruction). 8 any weapon was used or that there was a loss of consciousness or that it reached the level of being a felony. | 1 | 1 |
White v. Stategreen1 sentence2011For example, in White v. State, 995 So.2d 1172, 1174 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008), the Fourth District held that the defendant waived any claim for additional time served because he had entered a negotiated agreement that called for a specific sentence, which contemplated a specific amount of credit for time served. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Mesa v. State
green
1 sentence2004Id. at 1095-1096 . | 1 | 2004–2004 |
State v. Prieto
green
1 sentence1983Castor v. State, 365 So.2d 701 (Fla. 1978); State v. Prieto, 439 So.2d 288 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Castor v. State
green
1 sentence1983Castor v. State, 365 So.2d 701 (Fla. 1978); State v. Prieto, 439 So.2d 288 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Andrews v. State
green
2 sentences1963Appellant relies upon the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Andrews v. State, 99 Fla. 1350 , 126 So. 751 , 129 So. 771 . 1963Appellant relies upon the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Andrews v. State, 99 Fla. 1350 , 126 So. 751 , 129 So. 771 . | 1 | 1963–1963 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.