Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 Connecticut opinions name it 2 courts 2006–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Executive Rental & Leasing, Inc. v. Gershuny, McGettigan, Cameron Agency, Inc.green2 sentences2020See Wethersfield v. PR Arrow, LLC, 187 Conn. App. 604, 655 , 203 A.3d 645 (defendant ‘‘clearly waived’’ lack of personal jurisdic- tion claim on independent grounds that (1) it failed to file timely motion to dismiss and (2) it failed to file supporting memorandum of law with its motion), cert. denied, 331 Conn. 907 , 202 A.3d 1022 (2019); see also Executive Rental & Leasing, Inc. v. Gershuny Agency, Inc., 36 Conn. Supp. 567 , 569–70, 420 A.2d 1171 (1980) (trial court erred in granting movant’s motion for sum- mary judgment when movant failed to submit support- ing memorandum of law). 2020See Wethersfield v. PR Arrow, LLC, 187 Conn. App. 604, 655 , 203 A.3d 645 (defendant ‘‘clearly waived’’ lack of personal jurisdic- tion claim on independent grounds that (1) it failed to file timely motion to dismiss and (2) it failed to file supporting memorandum of law with its motion), cert. denied, 331 Conn. 907 , 202 A.3d 1022 (2019); see also Executive Rental & Leasing, Inc. v. Gershuny Agency, Inc., 36 Conn. Supp. 567 , 569–70, 420 A.2d 1171 (1980) (trial court erred in granting movant’s motion for sum- mary judgment when movant failed to submit support- ing memorandum of law). | 1 | 1 |
Town of Wethersfield v. PR Arrow, LLCgreen2 sentences2020See Wethersfield v. PR Arrow, LLC, 187 Conn. App. 604, 655 , 203 A.3d 645 (defendant ‘‘clearly waived’’ lack of personal jurisdic- tion claim on independent grounds that (1) it failed to file timely motion to dismiss and (2) it failed to file supporting memorandum of law with its motion), cert. denied, 331 Conn. 907 , 202 A.3d 1022 (2019); see also Executive Rental & Leasing, Inc. v. Gershuny Agency, Inc., 36 Conn. Supp. 567 , 569–70, 420 A.2d 1171 (1980) (trial court erred in granting movant’s motion for sum- mary judgment when movant failed to submit support- ing memorandum of law). 2020See Wethersfield v. PR Arrow, LLC, 187 Conn. App. 604, 655 , 203 A.3d 645 (defendant ‘‘clearly waived’’ lack of personal jurisdic- tion claim on independent grounds that (1) it failed to file timely motion to dismiss and (2) it failed to file supporting memorandum of law with its motion), cert. denied, 331 Conn. 907 , 202 A.3d 1022 (2019); see also Executive Rental & Leasing, Inc. v. Gershuny Agency, Inc., 36 Conn. Supp. 567 , 569–70, 420 A.2d 1171 (1980) (trial court erred in granting movant’s motion for sum- mary judgment when movant failed to submit support- ing memorandum of law). | 1 | 1 |
Town of Wethersfield v. PR Arrow, LLCgreen2 sentences2020See Wethersfield v. PR Arrow, LLC, 187 Conn. App. 604, 655 , 203 A.3d 645 (defendant ‘‘clearly waived’’ lack of personal jurisdic- tion claim on independent grounds that (1) it failed to file timely motion to dismiss and (2) it failed to file supporting memorandum of law with its motion), cert. denied, 331 Conn. 907 , 202 A.3d 1022 (2019); see also Executive Rental & Leasing, Inc. v. Gershuny Agency, Inc., 36 Conn. Supp. 567 , 569–70, 420 A.2d 1171 (1980) (trial court erred in granting movant’s motion for sum- mary judgment when movant failed to submit support- ing memorandum of law). 2020See Wethersfield v. PR Arrow, LLC, 187 Conn. App. 604, 655 , 203 A.3d 645 (defendant ‘‘clearly waived’’ lack of personal jurisdic- tion claim on independent grounds that (1) it failed to file timely motion to dismiss and (2) it failed to file supporting memorandum of law with its motion), cert. denied, 331 Conn. 907 , 202 A.3d 1022 (2019); see also Executive Rental & Leasing, Inc. v. Gershuny Agency, Inc., 36 Conn. Supp. 567 , 569–70, 420 A.2d 1171 (1980) (trial court erred in granting movant’s motion for sum- mary judgment when movant failed to submit support- ing memorandum of law). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Bellamygreen2 sentences2018See State v. Bellamy , 323 Conn. 400 , 404-410, 147 A.3d 655 (2016) (holding that defendant impliedly waived claim that trial court's jury instruction on witness identification was deficient when the defendant was provided copy of proposed jury instructions and indicated that he understood and accepted trial court's proposed identification instruction). 2018See State v. Bellamy , 323 Conn. 400 , 404-410, 147 A.3d 655 (2016) (holding that defendant impliedly waived claim that trial court's jury instruction on witness identification was deficient when the defendant was provided copy of proposed jury instructions and indicated that he understood and accepted trial court's proposed identification instruction). | 1 | 1 |
Vasquez v. Commissioner of Correctiongreen1 sentence2011See State v. Wells, 111 Conn. App. 84, 88-89 , 957 A.2d 557 , cert, denied, 289 Conn. 958 , 961 A.2d 423 (2008). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Jamar D.green1 sentence2011See State v. Wells, 111 Conn. App. 84, 88-89 , 957 A.2d 557 , cert, denied, 289 Conn. 958 , 961 A.2d 423 (2008). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Wellsgreen2 sentences2011See State v. Wells, 111 Conn. App. 84, 88-89 , 957 A.2d 557 , cert, denied, 289 Conn. 958 , 961 A.2d 423 (2008). 2011See State v. Wells, 111 Conn. App. 84, 88-89 , 957 A.2d 557 , cert, denied, 289 Conn. 958 , 961 A.2d 423 (2008). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Respassgreen2 sentences2008See, e.g., State v. Respass, 256 Conn. 164, 192-93 , 770 A.2d 471 (waiver occurred when court “explicitly gave both parties opportunities to conduct further inquiry, and both parties declined. . . . [I]f the defendant perceived the trial court’s inquiry as inadequate, then he would have complained during the inquiry process instead of waiting until after the jury had reached a verdict.” [Citation omitted.]), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1002 , 122 S. Ct. 478 , 151 L. 2008See, e.g., State v. Respass, 256 Conn. 164, 192-93 , 770 A.2d 471 (waiver occurred when court “explicitly gave both parties opportunities to conduct further inquiry, and both parties declined. . . . [I]f the defendant perceived the trial court’s inquiry as inadequate, then he would have complained during the inquiry process instead of waiting until after the jury had reached a verdict.” [Citation omitted.]), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1002 , 122 S. Ct. 478 , 151 L. | 1 | 1 |
Respass v. Connecticutgreen1 sentence2008See, e.g., State v. Respass, 256 Conn. 164, 192-93 , 770 A.2d 471 (waiver occurred when court “explicitly gave both parties opportunities to conduct further inquiry, and both parties declined. . . . [I]f the defendant perceived the trial court’s inquiry as inadequate, then he would have complained during the inquiry process instead of waiting until after the jury had reached a verdict.” [Citation omitted.]), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1002 , 122 S. Ct. 478 , 151 L. | 1 | 1 |
Galle v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programsgreen1 sentence2008See, e.g., State v. Respass, 256 Conn. 164, 192-93 , 770 A.2d 471 (waiver occurred when court “explicitly gave both parties opportunities to conduct further inquiry, and both parties declined. . . . [I]f the defendant perceived the trial court’s inquiry as inadequate, then he would have complained during the inquiry process instead of waiting until after the jury had reached a verdict.” [Citation omitted.]), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1002 , 122 S. Ct. 478 , 151 L. | 1 | 1 |
Gray v. Knowlesgreen1 sentence2008See, e.g., State v. Respass, 256 Conn. 164, 192-93 , 770 A.2d 471 (waiver occurred when court “explicitly gave both parties opportunities to conduct further inquiry, and both parties declined. . . . [I]f the defendant perceived the trial court’s inquiry as inadequate, then he would have complained during the inquiry process instead of waiting until after the jury had reached a verdict.” [Citation omitted.]), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1002 , 122 S. Ct. 478 , 151 L. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Hendersongreen1 sentence2006See State v. Cooper, 38 Conn. App. 661, 667 , 664 A.2d 773 (claims waived at trial are not reviewable), cert. denied, 235 Conn. 908 , 665 A.2d 903 (1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1214 , 116 S. Ct. 1837 , 134 L. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Adamsgreen1 sentence2006See State v. Cooper, 38 Conn. App. 661, 667 , 664 A.2d 773 (claims waived at trial are not reviewable), cert. denied, 235 Conn. 908 , 665 A.2d 903 (1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1214 , 116 S. Ct. 1837 , 134 L. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Coopergreen2 sentences2006See State v. Cooper, 38 Conn. App. 661, 667 , 664 A.2d 773 (claims waived at trial are not reviewable), cert. denied, 235 Conn. 908 , 665 A.2d 903 (1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1214 , 116 S. Ct. 1837 , 134 L. 2006See State v. Cooper, 38 Conn. App. 661, 667 , 664 A.2d 773 (claims waived at trial are not reviewable), cert. denied, 235 Conn. 908 , 665 A.2d 903 (1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1214 , 116 S. Ct. 1837 , 134 L. | 1 | 1 |
Tracy v. Chief of the National Guard Bureaugreen1 sentence2006See State v. Cooper, 38 Conn. App. 661, 667 , 664 A.2d 773 (claims waived at trial are not reviewable), cert. denied, 235 Conn. 908 , 665 A.2d 903 (1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1214 , 116 S. Ct. 1837 , 134 L. | 1 | 1 |
Cooper v. Connecticutgreen1 sentence2006See State v. Cooper, 38 Conn. App. 661, 667 , 664 A.2d 773 (claims waived at trial are not reviewable), cert. denied, 235 Conn. 908 , 665 A.2d 903 (1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1214 , 116 S. Ct. 1837 , 134 L. | 1 | 1 |
Weber v. Woodgreen1 sentence2006See State v. Cooper, 38 Conn. App. 661, 667 , 664 A.2d 773 (claims waived at trial are not reviewable), cert. denied, 235 Conn. 908 , 665 A.2d 903 (1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1214 , 116 S. Ct. 1837 , 134 L. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Kitchens
green
2 sentences2019In Morales, this court concluded that the defendant waived any claim of instructional error under State v. Kitchens, 299 Conn. 447 , 482–83, 10 A.3d 942 (2011). 2019In Morales, this court concluded that the defendant waived any claim of instructional error under State v. Kitchens, 299 Conn. 447 , 482–83, 10 A.3d 942 (2011). | 3 | 2016–2019 |
Mozell v. Commissioner of Correction
green
2 sentences2014Because we have concluded that the defendant waived any claim regarding the joinder of the cases for trial, “there is no error to correct.” State v. Kitchens, supra, 299 Conn. 474 n.18 . “[A] valid waiver *103 . . . thwarts plain error review of a claim.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Mozell v. Commissioner of Correction, 291 Conn. 62, 70 , 967 A.2d 41 (2009). 2014Because we have concluded that the defendant waived any claim regarding the joinder of the cases for trial, “there is no error to correct.” State v. Kitchens, supra, 299 Conn. 474 n.18 . “[A] valid waiver *103 . . . thwarts plain error review of a claim.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Mozell v. Commissioner of Correction, 291 Conn. 62, 70 , 967 A.2d 41 (2009). | 2 | 2010–2014 |
State v. Golding
green
2 sentences2024We agree with the Appellate Court that the defendant’s claim is reviewable pursuant to State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233 , 239–40, 567 A.2d 823 (1989), as modified by In re Yasiel R., 317 Conn. 773 , 781, 120 A.3d 1188 (2015). 2024We agree with the Appellate Court that the defendant’s claim is reviewable pursuant to State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233 , 239–40, 567 A.2d 823 (1989), as modified by In re Yasiel R., 317 Conn. 773 , 781, 120 A.3d 1188 (2015). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Plummer
green
1 sentence2017The applicable rule of practice, Practice Book § 17-44, provides in relevant part: "In any action ... any party may move for a summary judgment as to any claim or defense as a matter of right at any time if no scheduling order exists and the case has not been assigned for trial." 12 Although prior to October 1, 1992, Practice Book § 379, the precursor to § 17-44, required that the pleadings be closed before seeking a summary judgment, in Girard v. Weiss , 43 Conn.App. 397 , 682 A.2d 1078 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 946 , 686 A.2d 121 (1996), this court stated: "If we were to hold that a motion f | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Grimes v. Conservation Commission
green
1 sentence2017The applicable rule of practice, Practice Book § 17-44, provides in relevant part: "In any action ... any party may move for a summary judgment as to any claim or defense as a matter of right at any time if no scheduling order exists and the case has not been assigned for trial." 12 Although prior to October 1, 1992, Practice Book § 379, the precursor to § 17-44, required that the pleadings be closed before seeking a summary judgment, in Girard v. Weiss , 43 Conn.App. 397 , 682 A.2d 1078 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 946 , 686 A.2d 121 (1996), this court stated: "If we were to hold that a motion f | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Girard v. Weiss
green
2 sentences2017The applicable rule of practice, Practice Book § 17-44, provides in relevant part: "In any action ... any party may move for a summary judgment as to any claim or defense as a matter of right at any time if no scheduling order exists and the case has not been assigned for trial." 12 Although prior to October 1, 1992, Practice Book § 379, the precursor to § 17-44, required that the pleadings be closed before seeking a summary judgment, in Girard v. Weiss , 43 Conn.App. 397 , 682 A.2d 1078 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 946 , 686 A.2d 121 (1996), this court stated: "If we were to hold that a motion f 2017The applicable rule of practice, Practice Book § 17-44, provides in relevant part: "In any action ... any party may move for a summary judgment as to any claim or defense as a matter of right at any time if no scheduling order exists and the case has not been assigned for trial." 12 Although prior to October 1, 1992, Practice Book § 379, the precursor to § 17-44, required that the pleadings be closed before seeking a summary judgment, in Girard v. Weiss , 43 Conn.App. 397 , 682 A.2d 1078 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 946 , 686 A.2d 121 (1996), this court stated: "If we were to hold that a motion f | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State v. Cancel
green
2 sentences2014Because we have concluded that the defendant waived any claim regarding [a general instruction on the fallibility of eyewitness testimony], there is no error to correct. . . . [A] valid waiver . . . thwarts plain error review of a claim.’’ (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Cancel, 149 Conn. App. 86 , 102–103, 87 A.3d 618 , cert. denied, 311 Conn. 954 , A.3d (2014). 2014Because we have concluded that the defendant waived any claim regarding [a general instruction on the fallibility of eyewitness testimony], there is no error to correct. . . . [A] valid waiver . . . thwarts plain error review of a claim.’’ (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Cancel, 149 Conn. App. 86 , 102–103, 87 A.3d 618 , cert. denied, 311 Conn. 954 , A.3d (2014). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Paige
green
1 sentence2009The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 115 Conn. App. 717 (AC 27986), is granted, limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the defendant waived any challenge to the jury instruction regarding the materiality of the defendant’s testimony at a deposition?” KATZ, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.