George motion (Florida) · Go Syfert
← Florida issues

George motion in Florida

5 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1991–2024 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
Barnes v. Stategreen
fladistctapp · 2008 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
1 sentence

2024The court correctly recognized that "[a]n orally pronounced sentence is controlling when it differs from the subsequently written sentencing order." See Barnes v. State, 977 So. 2d 801, 802 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008).

11
Baxter v. Stategreen
fladistctapp · 2000 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2001–2001
2 sentences

2001See Baxter v. State, 769 So.2d 1097 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

2001See id.

11
State v. Watsogreen
fladistctapp · 2001 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2001–2001
1 sentence

2001See State v. Watso, 788 So.2d 1026 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).

11
Harrison v. Stategreen
fladistctapp · 1990 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 1993–1993
1 sentence

1993See Harrison v. State, 562 So.2d 827 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
George v. State green
fladistctapp · 2000
1 sentence

2001The trial court summarily denied the motion, and in George v. State, 760 So.2d 293 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), we reversed the order of the trial court and remanded for the trial court to determine whether George committed his offenses within the Heggs window. 1 The trial court correctly determined that the offenses were within the Heggs window; however, the trial court again denied George’s motion, finding that George was sentenced as a habitual offender and that the sentencing guidelines did not apply.

12001–2001
Casto v. Casto green
fla · 1987
1 sentence

1991The judge cited Casto v. Casto, 508 So.2d 330 (Fla. 1987), as authority for denying George's motion to set aside the Agreement.

11991–1991

Where else courts name it

TX 10 (1999–2025) CA 9 (1992–2024) PA 5 (1937–2019) OH 5 (2001–2026) FL 5 (1991–2024) AR 4 (2001–2016) GA 4 (1987–2022) AL 3 (1947–1992) WA 3 (2011–2021) MO 3 (2013–2022) VA 2 (1991–2008) WI 2 (1994–2019) AZ 2 (2003–2003) KS 2 (2018–2024) ND 2 (2002–2002) TN 2 (2001–2023) MN 2 (1927–1997) NM 2 (1998–2005)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check