5 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1971–1991 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Beverlygreen1 sentence1977See In re Beverly, supra . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
McIntosh v. Milano
green
2 sentences1991Moreover, it has been widely held that the psychiatrist-patient privilege is subject to a clear exception when the welfare of others makes it "necessary, in order to protect the patient or the community from imminent danger, to reveal confidential information disclosed by the patient. [Reprinted in 130 Am.Jur.Psych. 1058, at 1063 (1973)]." McIntosh, 168 N.J. 1991Super. at 491 , 403 A.2d at 512 (citing Principles of Medical Ethics, § 9 (1957)). 5. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Roper v. Roper
green
1 sentence1984In Roper v. Roper, 336 So.2d 654 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976), this court held that a parent, by seeking child custody in a dissolution proceeding, did not automatically thereby waive the psychiatrist-patient privilege contained in section 90.242, Florida Statutes (1975). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Yoho v. Lindsley
green
1 sentence1976Yoho v. Lindsley, 248 So.2d 187 (4th DCA Fla. 1971). | 1 | 1976–1976 |
In Re Lifschutz
green
2 sentences1971One of the most exhaustive treatments dealing with the scope and extent of this privilege appears in the recent decision of the Supreme Court of California in In re Lifschutz, 1970, 2 Cal.3d 415 , 85 Cal. Rptr. 829 , 467 P.2d 557 . 1971One of the most exhaustive treatments dealing with the scope and extent of this privilege appears in the recent decision of the Supreme Court of California in In re Lifschutz, 1970, 2 Cal.3d 415 , 85 Cal. Rptr. 829 , 467 P.2d 557 . | 1 | 1971–1971 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.