5 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1950–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Jivens v. Stategreen2 sentences2024After they left, Demmons came to the car wash to collect money from Tucker for a set of tire rims Demmons was selling. 2 Because this case involves an analysis of whether errors in excluding evidence were harmless, “we review the record de novo and weigh the evidence as we would expect reasonable jurors to have done instead of viewing it in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict.” Jivens v. State, 317 Ga. 859, 863 (2) (896 SE2d 516) (2023). 2 Tucker asked Demmons to wait because he was in the process of washing a car for a customer, Cedric Williams. 2024After they left, Demmons came to the car wash to collect money from Tucker for a set of tire rims Demmons was selling. 2 Because this case involves an analysis of whether errors in excluding evidence were harmless, “we review the record de novo and weigh the evidence as we would expect reasonable jurors to have done instead of viewing it in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict.” Jivens v. State, 317 Ga. 859, 863 (2) (896 SE2d 516) (2023). 2 Tucker asked Demmons to wait because he was in the process of washing a car for a customer, Cedric Williams. | 1 | 1 |
Robert Lemke v. Charles Ryangreen1 sentence2018See, e.g., Lemke v. Ryan, 719 F3d 1093, 1096-1097 (A) (9th Cir. 2013) (“a waiver of collateral attack must be express, and . . . a plain waiver of appeal does not suffice”; no waiver of collateral attack when written waiver provided only that defendant “gives up the right to appeal,” and colloquy with court mentioned only waiver of right to appeal and that defendant could file petition for post- conviction relief (punctuation omitted)); compare Griffis v. United States, No. 17-12944, 2018 U. S. App. LEXIS 23144, *3-4 (11th Cir., August 20, 2018) 6 Although this case involves waiver as part of | 1 | 1 |
Chancey v. Hancockgreen2 sentences1992It has been judicially construed as authorizing "the nondisclosure of the identity of an informant upon whose information an arrest or search is based [cit.]," Chancey v. Hancock, 233 Ga. 734, 736 (3) ( 213 SE2d 633 ) (1975), but we have found no other applications. (a) The difficulty with applying the state matter exemption to withhold the ECE from disclosure is that doing so would be inconsistent with Bd. of Regents, supra, 259 Ga. at 216-218 , because this case involves no claim of individual privacy. 1992It has been judicially construed as authorizing "the nondisclosure of the identity of an informant upon whose information an arrest or search is based [cit.]," Chancey v. Hancock, 233 Ga. 734, 736 (3) ( 213 SE2d 633 ) (1975), but we have found no other applications. (a) The difficulty with applying the state matter exemption to withhold the ECE from disclosure is that doing so would be inconsistent with Bd. of Regents, supra, 259 Ga. at 216-218 , because this case involves no claim of individual privacy. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia v. Atlanta Journal & Atlanta Constitution
green
2 sentences1992It has been judicially construed as authorizing “the nondisclosure of the identity of an informant upon whose information an arrest or search is based [cit.],” Chancey v. Hancock, 233 Ga. 734, 736 (3) ( 213 SE2d 633 ) (1975), but we have found no other applications. (a) The difficulty with applying the state matter exemption to withhold the ECE from disclosure is that doing so would be inconsistent with Bd. of Regents, supra, 259 Ga. at 216-218 , because this case involves no claim of individual privacy. 1992It has been judicially construed as authorizing "the nondisclosure of the identity of an informant upon whose information an arrest or search is based [cit.]," Chancey v. Hancock, 233 Ga. 734, 736 (3) ( 213 SE2d 633 ) (1975), but we have found no other applications. (a) The difficulty with applying the state matter exemption to withhold the ECE from disclosure is that doing so would be inconsistent with Bd. of Regents, supra, 259 Ga. at 216-218 , because this case involves no claim of individual privacy. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
International Paper Realty Co. v. Bethune
green
2 sentences1992As was the case in International Paper Realty Co. v. Bethune, 256 Ga. 54 ( 344 SE2d 228 ) (1986), “this case does not turn on the issue of a' landowner’s liability to invitees, licensees or trespassers who go upon his property and are injured there . . . this case involves a claim against a landowner whose land is immediately adjacent to a public way. 1992As was the case in International Paper Realty Co. v. Bethune, 256 Ga. 54 ( 344 SE2d 228 ) (1986), “this case does not turn on the issue of a' landowner’s liability to invitees, licensees or trespassers who go upon his property and are injured there . . . this case involves a claim against a landowner whose land is immediately adjacent to a public way. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Beard v. Beard
green
2 sentences1950Beard v. Beard, 197 Ga. 487 ( 29 S. E. 2d, 595 ). 1950Beard v. Beard, 197 Ga. 487 ( 29 S. E. 2d, 595 ). | 1 | 1950–1950 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.