Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1981–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Gregg v. Stategreen2 sentences2006Gregg v. State, 377 Md. 515, 554 , 833 A.2d 1040 (2003) (“Gregg was found effectively to have waived his right to counsel on the same day that he was tried, thereby eliminating the need for the part (5) advisement.”). 2006Gregg v. State, 377 Md. 515, 554 , 833 A.2d 1040 (2003) (“Gregg was found effectively to have waived his right to counsel on the same day that he was tried, thereby eliminating the need for the part (5) advisement.”). | 1 | 1 |
Harry Berenter, Inc. v. Bermangreen2 sentences1981We conclude that the General Assembly intended no change in thé existing law in this regard.” Berenter, 258 Md. at 297-99 , 265 A.2d at 763-64 [emphasis added], I recognize that Berenter involved a violation of § 255, prohibiting persons from engaging in the home improvement business unless licensed, while this case involves a violation of § 261 (a) prohibiting the receipt of any payments prior to the signing of a home improvement contract. 1981We conclude that the General Assembly intended no change in thé existing law in this regard.” Berenter, 258 Md. at 297-99 , 265 A.2d at 763-64 [emphasis added], I recognize that Berenter involved a violation of § 255, prohibiting persons from engaging in the home improvement business unless licensed, while this case involves a violation of § 261 (a) prohibiting the receipt of any payments prior to the signing of a home improvement contract. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Condon v. State
green
2 sentences2010“Grounded in ancient common law, the doctrine of sovereign immunity bars individuals from bringing actions against the State, thus protecting it from interference with governmental functions and preserving its control over its agencies and funds.” Condon v. State, 332 Md. 481, 492 , 632 A.2d 753 (1993). 2010“Grounded in ancient common law, the doctrine of sovereign immunity bars individuals from bringing actions against the State, thus protecting it from interference with governmental functions and preserving its control over its agencies and funds.” Condon v. State, 332 Md. 481, 492 , 632 A.2d 753 (1993). | 2 | 2010–2010 |
Rochkind v. Stevenson
green
2 sentences2023DISCUSSION Standard of Review This case involves a challenge to the admissibility of expert opinion under Maryland Rule 5-702(3) and Frye-Reed that originated before the issuance of Rochkind, 471 Md. 1 , 236 A.3d 630 . 2023DISCUSSION Standard of Review This case involves a challenge to the admissibility of expert opinion under Maryland Rule 5-702(3) and Frye-Reed that originated before the issuance of Rochkind, 471 Md. 1 , 236 A.3d 630 . | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Frye v. United States
red
1 sentence2023In Rochkind, id. at 5 , 236 A.3d at 633 , this Court discontinued use of the “general acceptance” standard for admissibility of expert testimony set forth in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Delaware State College v. Ricks
green
2 sentences2005We also note that the language of the Montgomery County Code mirrors the language used in the Federal statute as well as the State statute. 4 Therefore, Ricks and Chardon are both persuasive authorities in this case. *171 Ricks involved an allegation that the appellant, Columbus Ricks, was discriminated against when he was denied tenure at Delaware State College. 449 U.S. at 252 , 101 S.Ct. 498 . 2005We also note that the language of the Montgomery County Code mirrors the language used in the Federal statute as well as the State statute. 4 Therefore, Ricks and Chardon are both persuasive authorities in this case. *171 Ricks involved an allegation that the appellant, Columbus Ricks, was discriminated against when he was denied tenure at Delaware State College. 449 U.S. at 252 , 101 S.Ct. 498 . | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole v. Scott
green
2 sentences1999In either case, there would likely be only scant marginal deterrence because the police already suffer the exclusion of unlawfully seized evidence from criminal proceedings. 10 See Penn- *375 sylvania Bd. of Probation v. Scott, 524 U.S. 357 , -, 118 S.Ct. 2014, 2020 , 141 L.Ed.2d 344 (1998); United States v. Janis, 428 U.S. 433, 448 , 96 S.Ct. 3021, 3029 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1046 (1976); United States v. Calandra, 414 U.S. 338, 351 , 94 S.Ct. 613, 621 , 38 L.Ed.2d 561 (1974). 1999In either case, there would likely be only scant marginal deterrence because the police already suffer the exclusion of unlawfully seized evidence from criminal proceedings. 10 See Penn- *375 sylvania Bd. of Probation v. Scott, 524 U.S. 357 , -, 118 S.Ct. 2014, 2020 , 141 L.Ed.2d 344 (1998); United States v. Janis, 428 U.S. 433, 448 , 96 S.Ct. 3021, 3029 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1046 (1976); United States v. Calandra, 414 U.S. 338, 351 , 94 S.Ct. 613, 621 , 38 L.Ed.2d 561 (1974). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
United States v. Janis
green
2 sentences1999In either case, there would likely be only scant marginal deterrence because the police already suffer the exclusion of unlawfully seized evidence from criminal proceedings. 10 See Penn- *375 sylvania Bd. of Probation v. Scott, 524 U.S. 357 , -, 118 S.Ct. 2014, 2020 , 141 L.Ed.2d 344 (1998); United States v. Janis, 428 U.S. 433, 448 , 96 S.Ct. 3021, 3029 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1046 (1976); United States v. Calandra, 414 U.S. 338, 351 , 94 S.Ct. 613, 621 , 38 L.Ed.2d 561 (1974). 1999In either case, there would likely be only scant marginal deterrence because the police already suffer the exclusion of unlawfully seized evidence from criminal proceedings. 10 See Penn- *375 sylvania Bd. of Probation v. Scott, 524 U.S. 357 , -, 118 S.Ct. 2014, 2020 , 141 L.Ed.2d 344 (1998); United States v. Janis, 428 U.S. 433, 448 , 96 S.Ct. 3021, 3029 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1046 (1976); United States v. Calandra, 414 U.S. 338, 351 , 94 S.Ct. 613, 621 , 38 L.Ed.2d 561 (1974). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
United States v. Calandra
green
2 sentences1999In either case, there would likely be only scant marginal deterrence because the police already suffer the exclusion of unlawfully seized evidence from criminal proceedings. 10 See Penn- *375 sylvania Bd. of Probation v. Scott, 524 U.S. 357 , -, 118 S.Ct. 2014, 2020 , 141 L.Ed.2d 344 (1998); United States v. Janis, 428 U.S. 433, 448 , 96 S.Ct. 3021, 3029 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1046 (1976); United States v. Calandra, 414 U.S. 338, 351 , 94 S.Ct. 613, 621 , 38 L.Ed.2d 561 (1974). 1999In either case, there would likely be only scant marginal deterrence because the police already suffer the exclusion of unlawfully seized evidence from criminal proceedings. 10 See Penn- *375 sylvania Bd. of Probation v. Scott, 524 U.S. 357 , -, 118 S.Ct. 2014, 2020 , 141 L.Ed.2d 344 (1998); United States v. Janis, 428 U.S. 433, 448 , 96 S.Ct. 3021, 3029 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1046 (1976); United States v. Calandra, 414 U.S. 338, 351 , 94 S.Ct. 613, 621 , 38 L.Ed.2d 561 (1974). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.