patent error (Georgia) · Go Syfert
← Georgia issues

patent error in Georgia

5 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1885–2014 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Pope v. Popegreen
ga · 2003 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
2 sentences

2014In this case, the superior court entered the order of discharge on July 10, 2013, and the State filed its motion for reconsideration on September 5, 2013, within the same term of court. 13 Cf. Pope v. Pope, 277 Ga. 333, 335 ( 588 SE2d 736 ) (2003) (applying Buice and holding that “considering all the circumstances, including the lack of notice to [the respondent] of the final hearing, . . . the trial court did not err in exercising its inherent power to set aside the [final] judgment”). 14 OCGA § 17-17-5 (a). 15 OCGA § 17-17-7 (a). 16 OCGA § 17-17-8 (b). 7 victims to be aware of the proceeding

2014In this case, the superior court entered the order of discharge on July 10, 2013, and the State filed its motion for reconsideration on September 5, 2013, within the same term of court. 13 Cf. Pope v. Pope, 277 Ga. 333, 335 ( 588 SE2d 736 ) (2003) (applying Buice and holding that “considering all the circumstances, including the lack of notice to [the respondent] of the final hearing, . . . the trial court did not err in exercising its inherent power to set aside the [final] judgment”). 14 OCGA § 17-17-5 (a). 15 OCGA § 17-17-7 (a). 16 OCGA § 17-17-8 (b). 7 victims to be aware of the proceeding

11
Richmond County v. Richmond County Business Ass'ngreen
ga · 1971 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1973–1973
2 sentences

1973See in this connection, Richmond County v. Richmond County Business Assn., 228 Ga. 281 (2) ( 185 SE2d 399 ). *154 Art.

1973See in this connection, Richmond County v. Richmond County Business Assn., 228 Ga. 281 (2) ( 185 SE2d 399 ). *154 Art.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
City of Lithonia v. DeKalb County Board of Education green
ga · 1973
1 sentence

1982Such a result would be a patent violation of the due process and equal protection clauses of the State and Federal Constitutions by taxing only the citizens of unincorporated DeKalb County while allowing the residents of the municipal areas therein to receive the same benefits as those in the unincorporated areas, but not pay the same tax.” 231 Ga. at 153 .

11982–1982
Lamons v. Yarbrough green
ga · 1949
2 sentences

1972(Emphasis supplied.) In this situation the rule is that "It is the duty of the courts, in the interpretation of statutes, to seek diligently to arrive at the legislative intent, and, in order to do so, they should not adopt an arbitrary rule that the legislature intended to make a typographical or clerical error, the result of which would be to make nonsense of the act, and destroy it." Lamons v. Yarbrough, 206 Ga. 50 (1) ( 55 SE2d 551 , 11 ALR2d 717).

1972(Emphasis supplied.) In this situation the rule is that "It is the duty of the courts, in the interpretation of statutes, to seek diligently to arrive at the legislative intent, and, in order to do so, they should not adopt an arbitrary rule that the legislature intended to make a typographical or clerical error, the result of which would be to make nonsense of the act, and destroy it." Lamons v. Yarbrough, 206 Ga. 50 (1) ( 55 SE2d 551 , 11 ALR2d 717).

11972–1972
Patman v. State neutral
ga · 1878
2 sentences

1885There was no such, if any error at all, in t.his case, and construing the clauses of the charge excepted to with the entire charge, there w(is no error at all. 61 Ga., 379 ; 71 Id., .164, 167 and cit.

1885There was no such, if any error at all, in t.his case, and construing the clauses of the charge excepted to with the entire charge, there w(is no error at all. 61 Ga., 379 ; 71 Id., .164, 167 and cit.

11885–1885

Where else courts name it

LA 134 (1919–2026) PA 33 (1895–2026) CA 15 (1943–2023) FL 14 (1980–2022) TX 9 (1973–2012) KY 8 (1909–2023) NC 8 (1919–1996) NY 8 (1911–1998) MD 7 (1931–2016) IL 6 (1969–2022) GA 5 (1885–2014) WA 4 (2010–2013) MI 4 (1897–1978) CT 4 (2019–2019) MO 4 (1933–1978) NE 3 (1902–2005) MS 3 (1963–1998) VA 3 (1992–1993) WI 3 (1981–2007) CO 3 (1888–2015) OK 2 (2008–2008) MA 2 (1943–2000) OH 2 (2006–2020) AR 2 (1954–2011) NJ 2 (1971–2002) RI 2 (1997–1998)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check