5 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 2011–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Barker v. Wingogreen2 sentences2018See Barker v. Wingo , 407 U.S. at 530 [ 92 S.Ct. 2182 .] If, however, the delay *346 is determined to be presumptively prejudicial, then the court must engage the second tier of analysis by applying a four-factor balancing test to the facts of the case. 2018See Barker v. Wingo , 407 U.S. at 530 [ 92 S.Ct. 2182 .] If, however, the delay *346 is determined to be presumptively prejudicial, then the court must engage the second tier of analysis by applying a four-factor balancing test to the facts of the case. | 3 | 3 |
Gish v. Thomasgreen1 sentence2017Instead we read subsection (b) as providing a 5 Gish, 302 Ga. App. at 861 (citation and punctuation omitted). 10 narrower waiver than that contemplated by subsection (a). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Reddinggreen2 sentences2011State v. Redding, 274 Ga. 831, 832 ( 561 SE2d 79 ) (2002). 2011State v. Redding, 274 Ga. 831, 832 ( 561 SE2d 79 ) (2002). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Jakupovic v. State
green
2 sentences2011Jakupovic v. State, 287 Ga. 205 (1) ( 695 SE2d 247 ) (2010). 2011Jakupovic v. State, 287 Ga. 205 (1) ( 695 SE2d 247 ) (2010). | 2 | 2011–2011 |
Bowling v. State
green
2 sentences2011See Barker v. Wingo, 407 U. S. at 530 (“Until there is some delay which is presumptively prejudicial, there is no necessity for inquiry into the other factors that go into the balance.”); Bowling v. State, 285 Ga. 43 (1) (a) ( 673 SE2d 194 ) (2009). 2011See Barker v. Wingo, 407 U. S. at 530 (“Until there is some delay which is presumptively prejudicial, there is no necessity for inquiry into the other factors that go into the balance.”); Bowling v. State, 285 Ga. 43 (1) (a) ( 673 SE2d 194 ) (2009). | 2 | 2011–2011 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.