5 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2009 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Van's Material Co. v. Department of Revenuegreen2 sentences2009See Van’s Material, 131 Ill. 2d at 201-02 . 2009See Van's Material, 131 Ill.2d at 201-02 , 137 Ill.Dec. 42 , 545 N.E.2d 695 . | 1 | 1 |
People v. Wootersgreen2 sentences2001See also Wooters, 188 Ill.2d at 512-13 , 243 Ill.Dec. 33 , 722 N.E.2d 1102 (while invalidating the public act at issue, we held the legislature could pass legislation that amended several acts as long as the amendments related to the single subject of "crime"). *269 Moving to the second tier of our analysis, we must determine whether each individual amendment in Public Act 90-456 relates to the single subject of the criminal law. 2001See also Wooters, 188 Ill.2d at 512-13 , 243 Ill.Dec. 33 , 722 N.E.2d 1102 (while invalidating the public act at issue, we held the legislature could pass legislation that amended several acts as long as the amendments related to the single subject of "crime"). *269 Moving to the second tier of our analysis, we must determine whether each individual amendment in Public Act 90-456 relates to the single subject of the criminal law. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Ceja
green
2 sentences2005Ceja , 204 Ill. 2d at 360 . 2005Ceja, 204 Ill. 2d at 360 . | 2 | 2005–2005 |
Nemeth v. Banhalmi
green
2 sentences1987The primary issue before us falls within the second tier of inquiry: whether the respondent presented sufficient evidence to rebut the presumption. “[T]he quantum of evidence necessary in rebuttal depends on the circumstances of each case.” (Nemeth v. Banhalmi (1984), 125 Ill. 1987App. 3d 938, 961 , 466 N.E.2d 977, 993 .) Courts have required clear and convincing evidence to rebut the presumption where the relationship involved is between an attorney and client. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.