5 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1892–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Loretta M. Aliotta v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.green1 sentence2020See Aliotta, 315 F.3d 756, 763 (7th Cir. 2003) (“[W]e see no good reason why unqualified and unreliable scientific knowledge should be exempted from the expert evidence rules simply because the speaker is an employee of a party- opponent.”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ledezma v. State
green
2 sentences2023“Instead, in making the decision whether there is a reasonable probability that the 15 result of the trial would have been different, the burden of proof is on the defendant to establish this standard by a preponderance of the evidence.” Ledezma, 626 N.W.2d at 145 . 2002Id. at 145 . | 2 | 2002–2023 |
State v. Hogan
green
1 sentence1911State v. McGarry, 111 Iowa, 709 ; State v. Hogan, 115 Iowa, 455 ; State v. Thomas, 135 Iowa, 717 . | 1 | 1911–1911 |
State v. McGarry
green
1 sentence1911State v. McGarry, 111 Iowa, 709 ; State v. Hogan, 115 Iowa, 455 ; State v. Thomas, 135 Iowa, 717 . | 1 | 1911–1911 |
State v. Thomas
green
1 sentence1911State v. McGarry, 111 Iowa, 709 ; State v. Hogan, 115 Iowa, 455 ; State v. Thomas, 135 Iowa, 717 . | 1 | 1911–1911 |
Hough v. Hamlin
neutral
1 sentence1892Hough v. Hamlin, 57 Iowa, 359 . | 1 | 1892–1892 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.