employment discrimination claim (Iowa) · Go Syfert
← Iowa issues

employment discrimination claim in Iowa

5 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 2014–2019 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Baker v. Millergreen
ill · 1994 · cited in 3 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017
2 sentences

2017Similarly, in Baker, the Illinois Supreme Court rejected an employment discrimination claim for compensatory and punitive damages brought directly under article I, section 17 of the Illinois Constitution. 636 N.E.2d at 552, 559 .

2017Similarly, in Baker, the Illinois Supreme Court rejected an employment discrimination claim for compensatory and punitive damages brought directly under article I, section 17 of the Illinois Constitution. 636 N.E.2d at 552, 559 .

33
Deboom v. Raining Rose, Inc.green
iowa · 2009 · cited in 2 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2014–2019
2 sentences

2019Ctr., ___ N.W.2d ___, ___ (Iowa 2019) (reaffirming adoption of Price Waterhouse a-motivating-factor standard for employment 41 discrimination claims under the ICRA); DeBoom v. Raining Rose, Inc., 772 N.W.2d 1 , 13–14 (Iowa 2009) (adopting the a-motivating-factor standard for status-based discrimination-in-employment claims under the ICRA).13 As we clarified in Hawkins, there is no burden-shifting component inherent in the legal test for an employment discrimination claim under the ICRA. ___ N.W.2d at ___.

2019Ctr. , 929 N.W.2d 261 , 272 (Iowa 2019) (reaffirming adoption of Price Waterhouse a-motivating-factor standard for employment discrimination claims under the ICRA); DeBoom v. Raining Rose, Inc. , 772 N.W.2d 1 , 13-14 (Iowa 2009) (adopting the a-motivating-factor standard for status-based discrimination-in-employment claims under the ICRA). 13 As we clarified in Hawkins , there is no burden-shifting component inherent in the legal test for an employment discrimination claim under the ICRA. 929 N.W.2d at 272 .

12
State v. Jonesgreen
iowa · 1991 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
1 sentence

2014Even if Jacobson’s testimony was otherwise inadmissible, the fact Butcher put her performance at issue allows the court to admit evidence rebutting Butcher’s claim.5 See State v. Jones, 471 N.W.2d 833, 835 (Iowa 1991) (discussing rule that otherwise inadmissible evidence becomes admissible if a party “opens the 5 An element of the employment discrimination claim is that Butcher must show age was a motivating factor in the adverse employment decision.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
Hawkins v. Grinnell Regional Medical Center green
iowa · 2019
2 sentences

2019Ctr. , 929 N.W.2d 261 , 272 (Iowa 2019) (reaffirming adoption of Price Waterhouse a-motivating-factor standard for employment discrimination claims under the ICRA); DeBoom v. Raining Rose, Inc. , 772 N.W.2d 1 , 13-14 (Iowa 2009) (adopting the a-motivating-factor standard for status-based discrimination-in-employment claims under the ICRA). 13 As we clarified in Hawkins , there is no burden-shifting component inherent in the legal test for an employment discrimination claim under the ICRA. 929 N.W.2d at 272 .

2019Ctr. , 929 N.W.2d 261 , 272 (Iowa 2019) (reaffirming adoption of Price Waterhouse a-motivating-factor standard for employment discrimination claims under the ICRA); DeBoom v. Raining Rose, Inc. , 772 N.W.2d 1 , 13-14 (Iowa 2009) (adopting the a-motivating-factor standard for status-based discrimination-in-employment claims under the ICRA). 13 As we clarified in Hawkins , there is no burden-shifting component inherent in the legal test for an employment discrimination claim under the ICRA. 929 N.W.2d at 272 .

12019–2019

Statutes the citing opinions construe

IA § Iowa Code § 216.15 (4) IA § Iowa Code § 216.6 (4) IA § Iowa Code § 1A.1 (3) IA § Iowa Code § 216.16 (3) IA § Iowa Code § 216.2 (3) IA § Iowa Code § 663A.1 (3) IA § Iowa Code § 668A.1 (3) IA § Iowa Code § 669.14 (3) IA § Iowa Code § 669.2 (3) IA § Iowa Code § 669.4 (3) IA § Iowa Code § 669.5 (3) USC § 42u.s.c.1983 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

TX 25 (2006–2026) NY 25 (1985–2025) CA 21 (1984–2026) OH 16 (1999–2024) MA 16 (1994–2025) IL 13 (1989–2024) OR 11 (1982–2024) NJ 9 (1988–2025) ME 8 (2010–2023) MD 8 (2003–2023) WI 7 (1988–2018) MO 7 (1990–2022) LA 6 (1996–2025) MI 6 (1992–2025) CT 5 (1995–2022) IA 5 (2014–2019) HI 4 (2003–2023) MT 4 (1987–2018) MN 4 (1991–2024) WV 4 (1994–2007) FL 4 (2022–2024) WA 4 (1991–2019) DC 3 (1987–2011) UT 3 (1999–2013) NM 3 (2013–2013) AZ 3 (1983–2023) NV 3 (2011–2019) MS 3 (1994–1997) RI 2 (2007–2025) TN 2 (2011–2018) IN 2 (2020–2023) PA 2 (2016–2024) AK 2 (2013–2021) VT 2 (2012–2023)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check