care standard (Idaho) · Go Syfert
← Idaho issues

care standard in Idaho

5 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2025 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
Coombs v. Curnowgreen
idaho · 2009 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025
2 sentences

2025NCMC relies on Clark v. Klein, 137 Idaho 154, 159 , 45 P.3d 810, 815 (2002) and Coombs v. Curnow, 148 Idaho 129, 140 , 219 P.3d 453, 464 (2009).

2025NCMC relies on Clark v. Klein, 137 Idaho 154, 159 , 45 P.3d 810, 815 (2002) and Coombs v. Curnow, 148 Idaho 129, 140 , 219 P.3d 453, 464 (2009).

11
Clark v. Kleingreen
idaho · 2002 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025
2 sentences

2025NCMC relies on Clark v. Klein, 137 Idaho 154, 159 , 45 P.3d 810, 815 (2002) and Coombs v. Curnow, 148 Idaho 129, 140 , 219 P.3d 453, 464 (2009).

2025NCMC relies on Clark v. Klein, 137 Idaho 154, 159 , 45 P.3d 810, 815 (2002) and Coombs v. Curnow, 148 Idaho 129, 140 , 219 P.3d 453, 464 (2009).

11
Messmer v. Kergreen
idaho · 1974 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 1994–1994
2 sentences

1994Messmer v. Ker, 96 Idaho 75, 78 , 524 P.2d 536, 539 (1974).

1994Messmer v. Ker, 96 Idaho 75, 78 , 524 P.2d 536, 539 (1974).

11
Holland v. Petersongreen
idaho · 1974 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 1985–1985
2 sentences

1985As stated in Holland v. Peterson, 95 Idaho 728, 731 , 518 P.2d 1190, 1193 (1974): "Although appellants requested instruction is a correct general statement of the law, Coughran v. Hickox, 82 Idaho 18 , 348 P.2d 724 (1960), the court did not err in refusing to give it since it adequately covered the same subject matter in its instructions on negligence... .

1985As stated in Holland v. Peterson, 95 Idaho 728, 731 , 518 P.2d 1190, 1193 (1974): "Although appellants requested instruction is a correct general statement of the law, Coughran v. Hickox, 82 Idaho 18 , 348 P.2d 724 (1960), the court did not err in refusing to give it since it adequately covered the same subject matter in its instructions on negligence... .

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Stephen Boswell v. Amber Dawn Steele green
idahoctapp · 2015
2 sentences

2018Id . at 560, 348 P.3d at 503 .

2018Id. at 560 , 348 P.3d at 503 .

22018–2018
Jerome Thriftway Drug, Inc. v. Winslow green
idaho · 1986
2 sentences

2025In Clark, the Supreme Court found no error in the district court’s instruction on standard of care, stating: In the present case, Appellants objected to Instruction No. 18 because it states that “[t]he mere fact that an undesirable or unfortunate result occurs following medical care rendered by the Defendant does not, of itself, establish a breach of the standard of care.” Although in Jerome Thriftway Drug, Inc. v. Winslow, 110 Idaho 615 , 717 P.2d 1033 (1986), we found the trial court did not abuse its discretion in giving a jury instruction that provided “the mere occurrence of a fire does n

2025In Clark, the Supreme Court found no error in the district court’s instruction on standard of care, stating: In the present case, Appellants objected to Instruction No. 18 because it states that “[t]he mere fact that an undesirable or unfortunate result occurs following medical care rendered by the Defendant does not, of itself, establish a breach of the standard of care.” Although in Jerome Thriftway Drug, Inc. v. Winslow, 110 Idaho 615 , 717 P.2d 1033 (1986), we found the trial court did not abuse its discretion in giving a jury instruction that provided “the mere occurrence of a fire does n

12025–2025
Coughran v. Hickox green
idaho · 1960
2 sentences

1985As stated in Holland v. Peterson, 95 Idaho 728, 731 , 518 P.2d 1190, 1193 (1974): "Although appellants requested instruction is a correct general statement of the law, Coughran v. Hickox, 82 Idaho 18 , 348 P.2d 724 (1960), the court did not err in refusing to give it since it adequately covered the same subject matter in its instructions on negligence... .

1985As stated in Holland v. Peterson, 95 Idaho 728, 731 , 518 P.2d 1190, 1193 (1974): "Although appellants requested instruction is a correct general statement of the law, Coughran v. Hickox, 82 Idaho 18 , 348 P.2d 724 (1960), the court did not err in refusing to give it since it adequately covered the same subject matter in its instructions on negligence... .

11985–1985

Where else courts name it

IL 16 (1959–2022) CA 15 (1933–2022) WA 14 (1979–2025) MS 14 (1980–2015) TX 13 (1894–2013) MI 10 (1944–2023) IA 10 (2015–2026) KY 7 (1942–2026) DE 6 (1994–2023) MO 5 (1994–2014) ID 5 (1985–2025) IN 4 (1941–2008) GA 4 (1988–1998) OH 4 (1991–2007) MT 4 (2006–2016) LA 4 (1982–2012) MD 4 (1993–2019) VA 3 (2010–2017) KS 3 (2000–2026) NM 3 (1951–2024) CO 3 (2007–2016) TN 3 (2005–2025) NC 3 (1980–2014) NY 3 (1912–2018) OR 3 (2000–2018) CT 3 (1996–2019) PA 2 (2012–2017) AL 2 (1983–2009) FL 2 (2018–2026) MA 2 (2013–2018)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check