pre-termination hearing (Idaho) · Go Syfert
← Idaho issues

pre-termination hearing in Idaho

5 Idaho opinions name it 1 courts 1986–2023 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Mitchell v. Zilog, Inc.green
idaho · 1994 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
2 sentences

2015Jenkins, 141 Idaho at 240–41, 108 P.3d at 387–88; Mitchell v. Zilog, Inc., 125 Idaho 709, 712 , 874 P.2d 520, 523 (1994).

2015Jenkins, 141 Idaho at 240–41, 108 P.3d at 387–88; Mitchell v. Zilog, Inc., 125 Idaho 709, 712 , 874 P.2d 520, 523 (1994).

11
Johnson v. Allied Stores Corp.green
idaho · 1984 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 1986–1986
2 sentences

1986Johnson v. Allied Stores Corp., 106 Idaho 363, 368 , 679 P.2d 640, 645 (1984) (The trier of fact must determine whether “a contract existed between the parties by virtue of the 1962 policy manual____”); Jackson v. Minidoka Irrigation District, 98 Idaho 330 , *357 334, 563 P.2d 54, 58 (1977) (This Court enforces the right to a pre-termination hearing, since “a hearing is provided as a matter of contract (the handbook).”).

1986Johnson v. Allied Stores Corp., 106 Idaho 363, 368 , 679 P.2d 640, 645 (1984) (The trier of fact must determine whether “a contract existed between the parties by virtue of the 1962 policy manual____”); Jackson v. Minidoka Irrigation District, 98 Idaho 330 , *357 334, 563 P.2d 54, 58 (1977) (This Court enforces the right to a pre-termination hearing, since “a hearing is provided as a matter of contract (the handbook).”).

11
Jackson v. Minidoka Irrigation Districtgreen
idaho · 1977 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 1986–1986
2 sentences

1986Johnson v. Allied Stores Corp., 106 Idaho 363, 368 , 679 P.2d 640, 645 (1984) (The trier of fact must determine whether “a contract existed between the parties by virtue of the 1962 policy manual____”); Jackson v. Minidoka Irrigation District, 98 Idaho 330 , *357 334, 563 P.2d 54, 58 (1977) (This Court enforces the right to a pre-termination hearing, since “a hearing is provided as a matter of contract (the handbook).”).

1986Johnson v. Allied Stores Corp., 106 Idaho 363, 368 , 679 P.2d 640, 645 (1984) (The trier of fact must determine whether “a contract existed between the parties by virtue of the 1962 policy manual____”); Jackson v. Minidoka Irrigation District, 98 Idaho 330 , *357 334, 563 P.2d 54, 58 (1977) (This Court enforces the right to a pre-termination hearing, since “a hearing is provided as a matter of contract (the handbook).”).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill green
scotus · 1985
2 sentences

2002It should be an initial check against mistaken decisions — essentially, a de *82 termination of whether there are reasonable grounds to believe that the charges against the employee are true and support the proposed action.” Fridenstine at 192 , 983 P.2d at 846 (quoting Loudermill at 545-46 , 105 S.Ct. at 1495 , 84 L.Ed.2d at 506 ).

2002It should be an initial check against mistaken decisions — essentially, a de *82 termination of whether there are reasonable grounds to believe that the charges against the employee are true and support the proposed action.” Fridenstine at 192 , 983 P.2d at 846 (quoting Loudermill at 545-46 , 105 S.Ct. at 1495 , 84 L.Ed.2d at 506 ).

21999–2002
Brady v. Maryland green
scotus · 1963
1 sentence

2023An amended notice of findings of investigations later added two more alleged violations: disloyalty to the Sheriff’s Office and violating a rule established by an appointed official. 1 Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) (holding that suppression of evidence favorable to the defendant violates due process when the evidence is material to guilt or punishment). 3 On June 26, 2019, the Benewah County Board of Commissioners held a pre-termination hearing.

12023–2023
Patrice Ann McGraw v. City of Huntington Beach Charles Thompson and Earl Robitaille green
ca9 · 1989
2 sentences

2015To support this argument, Nix cites to McGraw v. City of Huntington Beach, 882 F.2d 384 (9th Cir. 1989).

2015To support this argument, Nix cites to McGraw v. City of Huntington Beach, 882 F.2d 384 (9th Cir. 1989).

12015–2015
Lawson v. Umatilla County green
ca9 · 1998
2 sentences

2015The disclaimer retained Nix’s at-will status even though “the policies also provide[d] . . . for an appeals process.” Lawson v. Umatilla Cnty., 139 F.3d 690 , 693 (9th Cir. 1998).

2015The disclaimer retained Nix’s at-will status even though “the policies also provide[d] ... for an appeals process.” Lawson v. Umatilla Cnty., 139 F.3d 690 , 693 (9th Cir.1998).

12015–2015
Jenkins v. Boise Cascade Corp. green
idaho · 2005
2 sentences

2015Jenkins, 141 Idaho at 240–41, 108 P.3d at 387–88; Mitchell v. Zilog, Inc., 125 Idaho 709, 712 , 874 P.2d 520, 523 (1994).

2015Jenkins, 141 Idaho at 240–41, 108 P.3d at 387–88; Mitchell v. Zilog, Inc., 125 Idaho 709, 712 , 874 P.2d 520, 523 (1994).

12015–2015
Fridenstine v. Idaho Department of Administration green
idaho · 1999
1 sentence

2002It should be an initial check against mistaken decisions — essentially, a de *82 termination of whether there are reasonable grounds to believe that the charges against the employee are true and support the proposed action.” Fridenstine at 192 , 983 P.2d at 846 (quoting Loudermill at 545-46 , 105 S.Ct. at 1495 , 84 L.Ed.2d at 506 ).

12002–2002

Where else courts name it

PA 44 (1976–2025) LA 37 (1982–2025) AK 12 (1993–2026) OH 11 (1985–2022) RI 11 (1980–2023) MD 10 (1982–2020) CA 10 (1986–2024) NM 10 (1997–2017) WV 8 (1994–2017) TN 7 (2008–2021) AZ 7 (1977–2007) OR 6 (1976–2015) AL 6 (1979–2016) NY 6 (1975–2009) GA 6 (1979–2017) ID 5 (1986–2023) VT 5 (1974–2015) MO 5 (1984–2023) FL 5 (1980–2008) ND 5 (2002–2019) MS 4 (2003–2021) MA 4 (1970–2024) OK 4 (1986–2014) DE 3 (1974–2015) IN 3 (1980–2011) WI 3 (1983–2024) UT 3 (2001–2020) MI 3 (1971–2025) SD 3 (2000–2001) CO 3 (1984–1994) KY 3 (2012–2024) VA 2 (2014–2018) NH 2 (2015–2023) MT 2 (1994–1994) WY 2 (1986–2007) NV 2 (1978–2005) TX 2 (1988–1989) DC 2 (2014–2024) MN 2 (1984–1986) WA 2 (1985–1986)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check