Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Vermont opinions name it 2 courts 1974–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Vermont courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Kelly Baird v. Board Of Education For Warren Community Unit School District No. 205green2 sentences2015Baird , 389 F.3d at 692 (holding that “when the only available post-termination remedy is the opportunity to bring a state breach of contract suit, the pre-termination hearing . . . must fully satisfy the due process requirements of confrontation and cross-examination in addition to the minimal Loudermill requirements of notice and an opportunity to be heard”). ¶ 17. 2015Baird, 389 F.3d at 692 (holding that “when the only available post-termination remedy is the opportunity to bring a state breach of contract suit, the pre-termination hearing . . . must fully satisfy the due process requirements of confrontation and cross-examination in addition to the minimal Loudennill requirements of notice and an opportunity to be heard.”). ¶ 17. | 3 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Vermont. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Garraghty v. Jordan
green
1 sentence2015Garraghty v. Jordan , 830 F.2d 1295 (4th Cir. 1987), also cited by the City, is likewise distinguishable. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Connolly v. City of Rutland
green
2 sentences2015The Town urges us to follow the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Connolly v. City of Rutland, 487 F. App’x 666 (2d Cir. 2012), in which the court held that a pre-termination hearing followed by Rule 75 review complied with due process. 2015Id. at 667 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill
green
1 sentence2014The pre-termination hearing in this case is known as a Loudermill hearing after Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532 (1985). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth
green
1 sentence1974Arnett and its precursors, Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 (1972); Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U. S. 593 (1972); Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 (1970) have clearly established that nonprobationary employment in the public sector is a property right entitled to protection under the Fourteenth Amendment. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Perry v. Sindermann
green
1 sentence1974Arnett and its precursors, Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 (1972); Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U. S. 593 (1972); Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 (1970) have clearly established that nonprobationary employment in the public sector is a property right entitled to protection under the Fourteenth Amendment. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Goldberg v. Kelly
green
1 sentence1974Arnett and its precursors, Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 (1972); Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U. S. 593 (1972); Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 (1970) have clearly established that nonprobationary employment in the public sector is a property right entitled to protection under the Fourteenth Amendment. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.