Cases pin-citing Mottley · Go Syfert
Search » Famous passages » Cases pin-citing Mottley

Cases pin-citing Mottley

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Mottley  ·  1908  ·  58 pinpoint citations from 22 cases, 17 distinct passages.

Boitet v. Perry  ·  2023-03-16  ·  M.D. Florida  ·  pin 211 U.S. at 149
“[A] suit arises under the Constitution and laws of the United States only when the plaintiffs statement of his own cause of action shows that it is based upon those laws or that Constitution.”
Colarossi v. Harris  ·  2019-12-16  ·  E.D. Texas  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 211 L. Ed. at 126
“Although such allegations show that very likely, in the course of the litigation, a question under the Constitution would arise, they do not show that the suit, that is, the plaintiff’s original cause of action, arises under the Constitution.”
(PC) Guillen v. Carrillo  ·  2019-08-08  ·  E.D. California  ·  pin 211 U.S. at 149
“[A] suit arises under the Constitution and laws of the United States only when the 8 plaintiff's statement of his own cause of action shows that it is based upon those laws or that 9 Constitution.”
Chestnut v. Merrill  ·  2019-01-28  ·  N.D. Alabama  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 211 L. Ed. at 42
"[I]t is the duty of this court to see to it that the jurisdiction of the circuit court, which is defined and limited by statute, is not exceeded."
In re: Grand Jury Subpoena  ·  2019-01-08  ·  D.C. Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 211 L. Ed. at 42
"Neither party has questioned that jurisdiction, but it is the duty of this court to see to it that the jurisdiction of the circuit court, which is defined and limited by statute, is not exceeded."
United States v. Armijo-Banda  ·  2018-11-28  ·  W.D. Texas  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 211 L. Ed. at 42
"[I]f the order is void on its face for want of jurisdiction, it is the duty of this and every other court to disregard it."
United States v. Lopez-Urgel  ·  2018-11-14  ·  W.D. Texas  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 211 L. Ed. at 42
"[I]f the order is void on its face for want of jurisdiction, it is the duty of this and every other court to disregard it."
Wright v. Musanti  ·  2018-04-13  ·  Second Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 211 L. Ed. at 42
"Under the longstanding well-pleaded complaint rule, ... a suit 'arises under' federal law ... 'only when the plaintiff's statement of his own cause of action shows that it is based upon [federal law].' "
In Re Lipitor Antitrust Litigation  ·  2017-04-13  ·  Third Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 211 L. Ed. at 42
“The existence or expectation of a federal defense is insufficient to confer federal jurisdiction.”
Veneruso v. Mount Vernon Neighborhood Health Center  ·  2013-03-22  ·  S.D. New York  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 211 L. Ed. at 42
“It is not enough that the plaintiff alleges. some anticipated defense to his cause of action and asserts that the defense is invalidated by some provision of the Constitution of the United States.”
Firstenberg v. City of Santa Fe  ·  2012-10-09  ·  Tenth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 211 L. Ed. at 42
“It is not enough that the plaintiff alleges some anticipated defense to his cause of action, and asserts that the defense is invalidated by some provision of the Constitution.... ”
Devon Energy Production Co. v. Mosiac Potash Carlsbad, Inc.  ·  2012-08-22  ·  Tenth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 211 L. Ed. at 42
“[I]t must be clear from the face of the plaintiffs complaint that there is a federal question.”
Stewart v. Atwood  ·  2012-01-17  ·  W.D. New York  ·  pin 53 L. Ed. at 126
“a suit arises under the Constitution and laws of the United States only when the plaintiffs statement of his own cause of action shows that it is based upon those laws of that Constitution. It is not enough that the plaintiff alleges some anticipated defense to his cause of action. ...”
Royal Cosmopolitan, LLC v. Star Real Estate Group, LLC  ·  2008-12-17  ·  E.D. Louisiana  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 211 L. Ed. at 42
“[A] suit arises under the Constitution and laws of the United States only when the plaintiffs statement of his own cause of action shows that it is based upon those laws or that Constitution.”
Parlin v. DynCorp International, Inc.  ·  2008-09-30  ·  D. Delaware  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 211 L. Ed. at 42
“It is not enough that the plaintiff alleges some anticipated defense to his cause of action, and asserts that the defense is invalidated by some provision of the Constitution of the United States.”
Weckesser v. Chicago Bridge & Iron  ·  2008-05-06  ·  Fifth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 211 L. Ed. at 42
“[A] suit arises under the Constitution and laws of the United States only when the plaintiff’s statement of his own cause of action shows that it is based upon those laws or that Constitution.”
York v. Day Transfer Co.  ·  2007-11-20  ·  D. Rhode Island  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 211 L. Ed. at 42
“[A] suit arises under the Constitution and laws of the United States only when the plaintiffs statement of his own cause of action shows that it is based upon those laws or that Constitution.”
Hoskins v. Bekins Van Lines  ·  2003-09-10  ·  Fifth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 211 L. Ed. at 42
“[A] suit arises under the Constitution and laws of the United States only when the plaintiffs statement of his own cause of action shows that it is based upon those laws or that Constitution.”
Gannett River States Publishing Corp. v. Mississippi State University  ·  1996-02-29  ·  S.D. Mississippi  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 211 L. Ed. at 42
“Although such allegations show that *131 very likely, in the course of the litigation, a question under the Constitution would arise, they do not show that the suit, that is, the plaintiffs original cause of action arises under the Constitution”
William C. Kelly, III v. United States  ·  1994-07-06  ·  Seventh Circuit  ·  2 pin-cites  ·  pin 29 L. Ed. at 42
“Neither party has questioned that jurisdiction, but it is the duty of this court to see to it that the jurisdiction of the circuit court, which is defined and limited by statute, is not exceeded. This duty we have frequently performed on our own motion.”
Anderson v. John Morrell & Co.  ·  1987-09-30  ·  Eighth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 211 L. Ed. at 42
“well-pleaded complaint rule”
Anderson v. John Morrell & Company  ·  1987-09-30  ·  Eighth Circuit  ·  3 pin-cites  ·  pin 211 L. Ed. at 42
"well-pleaded complaint rule"
Page 1 of 2   Next →