Topic #10076

4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 37 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from John W. Schoettmer & Karen Schoettmer v. Jolene C. Wright & South Central Community Action Program, Inc..

#	Case	Flag	Canonical passage	Citers
1	John W. Schoettmer & Karen Schoettmer v. Jolene C. Wright & South Central Community Action Program, Inc. Anchor ind · 2013	green	“care to ensure that no party is denied his day in court.”	13
2	Don H. Gunderson and Bobbie J. Gunderson, Co-Trustees of the Don H. Gunderson Living Trust v. State of Indiana, Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Alliance for the Great Lakes ind · 2018	green	“we limit our review to the materials designated at the trial level.”	13
3	John W. Schoettmer & Karen Schoettmer v. Jolene C. Wright & South Central Community Action Program, Inc. ind · 2013	green	“any doubt as to any facts or inferences to be drawn therefrom . . . in favor of the non-moving party.”	6
4	Katrina Murray and Aquila F. Flynn, as Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Jaylan T.R. Murray v. Indianapolis Public Schools and Arlington Community High School ind · 2019	green	“summary judgment is appropriate 'if the designated evidentiary matter shows that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”	5

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check