5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 37 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from City of Clarkson Valley v. Mineta.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | City of Clarkson Valley v. Mineta Anchor | green | “it is well established that standing is a jurisdictional prerequisite that must be resolved before reaching the merits of a suit.” | 11 |
| 2 | City of Clarkson Valley v. Mineta | green | “standing is a jurisdictional prerequisite that must be resolved before reaching the merits of a suit.” | 10 |
| 3 | Missourians for Fiscal Accountability v. Klahr | green | “an intention to engage in a course of conduct arguably affected with a constitutional interest, but proscribed by a statute, and there exists a credible threat of prosecution thereunder.” | 9 |
| 4 | Missourians for Fiscal, etc. v. James Klahr | green | “when a state restricts speech, it bears the burden of proving the constitutionality of its actions.” | 4 |
| 5 | New Doe Child 1 v. United States | green | “unless a law burdens a fundamental right, targets a suspect class, or has a disparate impact on a protected class and was motivated by a discriminatory intent, we apply rational basis scrutiny to the challenged law.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.