3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Nowakowski v. New York.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nowakowski v. New York Anchor | green | “in order for a federal court to have jurisdiction over a habeas petition, the petitioner must be 'in custody pursuant to the judgment of a state court' at the time that petition is filed.” | 11 |
| 2 | Sean Earley v. Timothy Murray | green | “post-release supervision, admitting of the possibility of revocation and additional jail time, is considered to be 'custody.” | 10 |
| 3 | Maleng v. Cook | green | “in order for a federal court to have jurisdiction over a habeas petition, the petitioner must be 'in custody pursuant to the judgment of a state court' at the time that petition is filed.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.