8 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 36 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Daniel Chill v. General Electric Company.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Daniel Chill v. General Electric Company Anchor | green | “an egregious refusal to see the obvious, or to investigate the doubtful, may in some cases give rise to an inference of ... recklessness.” | 8 |
| 2 | Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,862 G. A. Thompson & Co., Inc. v. Herbert Partridge, Robert M. Presley, Frank Andrews and C. Thomas Murphy | green | “culpability and good faith are two sides of the same issue” | 4 |
| 3 | Metge v. Baehler | green | “culpability and good faith are two sides of the same issue” | 4 |
| 4 | In Re Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. Securities Litigation | green | “in some meaningful sense culpable participants in the fraud perpetrated by controlled persons” | 4 |
| 5 | In Re Leslie Fay Companies, Inc. | green | “alleging facts raising a reasonable inference of intent meets that scienter standard.” | 3 |
| 6 | In Re Citisource, Inc. Securities Litigation | green | “it has long been held that once a defendant has been shown to be a controlling person, the burden shifts to that defendant to establish his good faith” | 3 |
| 7 | Gabriel Capital, L.P. v. NatWest Finance, Inc. | green | “applied only a portion of the 10(b) standard” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.