3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 36 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ayers v. Hudson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ayers v. Hudson Anchor | green | “factual determinations by state courts are presumed correct absent clear and convincing evidence to the contrary, 2254(e)(1), and a decision adjudicated on the merits in a state court and based on a factual determination will not be overturned on factual grounds unless objectiv…” | 22 |
| 2 | Conny Moritz v. Jeffrey Woods | green | “only unreasonable where they are 'rebutted by clear and convincing evidence' and do not have support in the record.” | 11 |
| 3 | Ayers v. Hudson | green | “a decision adjudicated on the merits in a state court and based on a factual determination will not be overturned on factual grounds unless objectively unreasonable in light of the evidence presented in the state-court proceeding.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.