4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 36 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Fox v. Maulding.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fox v. Maulding Anchor | green | “suits are parallel if substantially the same parties litigate substantially the same issues in different forums.” | 19 |
| 2 | Fox v. Maulding | green | “the weight to be given to any one factor may vary greatly from case to case, depending on the particular setting of the case.” | 6 |
| 3 | Carlton Allen v. Board Of Education, Unified School District 436 | green | “the state proceedings as they actually exist to determine whether they are parallel to the federal proceedings, resolving any doubt in favor of exercising federal jurisdiction.” | 6 |
| 4 | Fox v. Maulding | green | “must first determine whether the state and federal proceedings are parallel.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.