5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 36 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Snyder v. FARNAM COMPANIES, INC..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Snyder v. FARNAM COMPANIES, INC. Anchor | green | “if no conflict exists, the law of the forum state applies.” | 11 |
| 2 | PV Ex Rel. TV v. Camp Jaycee | green | “procedurally, the first step is to determine whether an actual conflict exists. that is done by examining the substance of the potentially applicable laws to determine whether there is a distinction between them.” | 10 |
| 3 | Warriner v. Stanton | green | “in a diversity action, a district court must apply the choice of law rules of the forum state to determine what law will govern the substantive issues of a case.” | 9 |
| 4 | ARLANDSON v. Hartz Mountain Corp. | green | “the court must determine which state has the most significant relationship to the claim, by weighing the factors set forth in the restatement section corresponding to the plaintiff's cause of action.” | 3 |
| 5 | Sinclair v. Merck & Co., Inc. | green | “the legislature expressly provided . . . that claims for 'harm caused by a product' are governed by the njpla 'irrespective of the theory underlying the claim” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.