5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 196 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Clark v. Haas Group, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Clark v. Haas Group, Inc. Anchor | green | “rule 56 does not impose upon the district court a duty to sift through the record in search of evidence to support a party's opposition to summary judgment....” | 62 |
| 2 | Skotak v. Tenneco Resins, Inc. | green | “rule 56 does not impose upon the district court a duty to sift through the record in search of evidence to support a party's opposition to summary judgment....” | 62 |
| 3 | Fleming v. Grand Jury Foreperson, Special Grand Jury 89-2 | green | “rule 56 does not impose upon the district court a duty to sift through the record in search of evidence to support a party's opposition to summary judgment....” | 61 |
| 4 | Michigan Protection and Advocacy Service, Incorporated v. Babin | green | “the plaintiff must present more than a scintilla of evidence in support of his position; the evidence must be such that a jury could reasonably find for the plaintiff.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.