Topic: alter rather than preserve the status quo · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #10527

4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 36 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 6.56 Acres of Land.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 6.56 Acres of Land Anchor
ca4 · 2019
green “alter rather than preserve the status quo” 13
2 Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 6.56 Acres of Land
ca4 · 2019
green “the applicant's right to relief is indisputably clear.” 13
3 International Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump
ca4 · 2017
green “as the district court did, we consider the balance of the equities and the public interest factors together.” 5
4 Pruett v. Choate
scotus · 2017
green “as the district court did, we consider the balance of the equities and the public interest factors together.” 5

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check