3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Richard Morales v. Quintel Entertainment, Inc. And Peter Stolz.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Richard Morales v. Quintel Entertainment, Inc. And Peter Stolz Anchor | green | “ach party's motion must be examined on its own merits, and in each case all reasonable inferences must be drawn against the party whose motion is under consideration.” | 11 |
| 2 | Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. | green | “ll reasonable inferences must be drawn against the party whose motion is under consideration.” | 8 |
| 3 | Richard Morales v. Quintel Entertainment, Inc. And Peter Stolz | green | “ll reasonable inferences must be drawn against the party whose motion is under consideration.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.