5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 235 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Bridgeman.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Bridgeman Anchor | green | “pursuant to crim.r. 29(a), a court shall not order an entry of judgment of acquittal if the evidence is such that reasonable minds can reach different conclusions as to whether each material element of a crime has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt.” | 101 |
| 2 | State v. Bridgeman | green | “if the evidence is such that reasonable minds can reach different conclusions as to whether each material element of a crime has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt.” | 39 |
| 3 | State v. Bridgeman | green | “pursuant to criminal rule 29(a), a court shall not order an entry of judgment of acquittal if the evidence is such that reasonable minds can reach different conclusions as to whether each material element of a crime has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt.” | 39 |
| 4 | State v. Lindsey | green | “exceptional case in which the evidence weighs heavily against a conviction.” | 36 |
| 5 | State v. Apanovitch | green | “should be granted only where reasonable minds could not fail to find reasonable doubt.” | 20 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.