4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 35 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Sizova v. National Institute of Standards & Technology.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sizova v. National Institute of Standards & Technology Anchor | green | “when a defendant moves to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, either party should be allowed discovery on the factual issues raised by that motion.” | 20 |
| 2 | Sizova v. National Institute of Standards & Technology | green | “prejudice is present where pertinent facts bearing on the question of jurisdiction are controverted . . . or where a more satisfactory showing of the facts is necessary.” | 6 |
| 3 | Sizova v. National Institute of Standards & Technology | green | “pertinent facts bearing on the question of jurisdiction are controverted . . . or where a more satisfactory showing of the facts is necessary.” | 5 |
| 4 | Grynberg v. IVANHOE ENERGY, INC. | green | “in determining whether to allow jurisdiction discovery, however, the trial court 'is vested with broad discretion.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.