3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 35 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Pet Food Products Liability Litigation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Pet Food Products Liability Litigation Anchor | green | “protects unnamed class members from unjust or unfair settlements affecting their rights when the representatives become fainthearted before the action is adjudicated or are able to secure satisfaction of their individual claims by a compromise” | 18 |
| 2 | DeJulius v. New England Health Care Employees Pension Fund | green | “coextensive and substantially similar.” | 13 |
| 3 | DeJulius v. New England Health Care Employees Pension Fund | green | “the legal standards for satisfying rule 23(c)(2)(b) and the constitutional guarantee of procedural due process are coextensive and substantially similar.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.