4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 35 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Donna Jones v. Secretary, Health and Human Services.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Donna Jones v. Secretary, Health and Human Services Anchor | green | “such relevant evidence that a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.” | 14 |
| 2 | Winslow v. Commissioner of Social Security | green | “whether the findings of the alj are supported by substantial evidence.” | 13 |
| 3 | Nicole Torres v. Commissioner of Social Security | green | “conflicting evidence that would suggest further limitations, under the substantial evidence standard, administrative findings are not subject to reversal merely because substantial evidence exists in the record to support a different conclusion.” | 5 |
| 4 | Kuhn v. Commissioner of Social Security | green | “review of a decision of the commissioner of social security, made through an administrative law judge, is extremely circumscribed.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.