7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 35 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Kamilewicz v. Bank of Boston Corporation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kamilewicz v. Bank of Boston Corporation Anchor | green | “federal plaintiff seeks to set aside a state court judgment or whether he is, in fact, presenting an independent claim.” | 6 |
| 2 | Jamie Swartz v. Heartland Equine Rescue | green | “either 'directly' challenge a state court judgment or are 'inextricably intertwined with one.” | 6 |
| 3 | Sykes v. Cook County Circuit Court Probate Division | green | “hinges on whether the federal claim alleges that the injury was caused by the state court judgment, or alternatively, whether the federal claim alleges an independent prior injury that the state court failed to remedy.” | 6 |
| 4 | A.D. Brokaw v. Karen Weaver, Mercer County, State of Illinois | green | “no matter how erroneous or unconstitutional the state court judgment may be, the supreme court of the united states is the only federal court that could have jurisdiction to review a state court judgment.” | 5 |
| 5 | Jakupovic v. Curran | green | “the plaintiff had a reasonable opportunity to raise the issue in state court proceedings.” | 5 |
| 6 | Kamilewicz v. Bank of Boston Corporation | green | “impermissible appellate review.” | 4 |
| 7 | Dynak v. Board of Education of Wood Dale School District 7 | green | “transfer of title and title acquired,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.