7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 35 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Fred Taylor v. City of Shreveport.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fred Taylor v. City of Shreveport Anchor | green | “unlike title i of the ada, title ii does not create a cause of action for employment discrimination.” | 8 |
| 2 | Yasmin Reyazuddin v. Montgomery County, Maryland | green | “based on the text and structure of title ii and the ada, we agree with the majority of circuits to have considered the question that title ii unambiguously does not provide a vehicle for public employment discrimination claims.” | 6 |
| 3 | Mary Jo C. v. New York State and Local Retirement System et ano. | green | “unambiguously limits employment discrimination claims to title i” | 5 |
| 4 | Parker v. Metropolitan Life Insurance | green | “the statutory framework of the ada expressly limits discrimination in employment practices to title i of the ada” | 5 |
| 5 | Menkowitz v. Pottstown Memorial Medical Center | green | “it is evident that congress sought to regulate disability discrimination in the area of employment exclusively through title i” | 4 |
| 6 | Fred Taylor v. City of Shreveport | green | “title ii does not create a cause of action for employment discrimination.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.