3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Wilson v. Sellers.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wilson v. Sellers Anchor | green | “we conclude that federal habeas law employs a 'look through' presumption.” | 19 |
| 2 | Sedley Alley v. Ricky Bell | green | “if an unexhausted claim would be procedurally barred under state law, that claim is procedurally defaulted for purposes of federal habeas review” | 5 |
| 3 | Gerald Hand v. Marc Houk | green | “we have previously held that an ohio court's application of the res judicata doctrine is an adequate and independent state ground that bars federal habeas relief.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.