4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 35 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Fowler v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fowler v. State Anchor | green | “within the zone of reasonable disagreement.” | 13 |
| 2 | Martinez v. State | green | “an extraneous offense is any act of misconduct, whether resulting in prosecution or not, which is not shown in the charging instrument and which was shown to have been committed by the accused.” | 11 |
| 3 | Belcher v. State | green | “essentially, article 38.37 is an evidentiary rule applicable to certain types of sexual abuse cases . . . that supersedes the application of texas rule of evidence 404(b), and makes admissible certain extraneous offense evidence that rule 404(b) does not.” | 6 |
| 4 | Martinez v. State | green | “any act of misconduct, whether resulting in prosecution or not, which is not shown in the charging instrument and which was shown to have been committed by the accused.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.