4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 35 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from City of Birmingham v. Business Realty Inv. Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | City of Birmingham v. Business Realty Inv. Co. Anchor | green | “when an appellant fails to cite any authority for an argument on a particular issue, this court may affirm the judgment as to that issue, for it is neither this court's duty nor its function to perform an appellant's legal research.” | 25 |
| 2 | Hamm v. State | green | “the contentions of the appellant/petitioner with respect to the issues presented, and the reasons therefor, with citations to the cases, statutes, other authorities, and parts of the record relied on.” | 4 |
| 3 | City of Birmingham v. Business Realty Inv. Co. | green | “it is neither this court's duty nor its function to perform an appellant's legal research.” | 3 |
| 4 | Hamm v. State | green | “recitation of allegations without citation to any legal authority and without adequate recitation of the facts relied upon has been deemed a waiver of the arguments listed.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.