4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Egbert v. Boule.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Egbert v. Boule Anchor | green | “at bottom, creating a cause of action is a legislative endeavor.” | 10 |
| 2 | Egbert v. Boule | green | “e have explained that a new context arises when there are 'potential special factors that previous bivens cases did not consider.” | 7 |
| 3 | Mark Pettibone v. Gabriel Russell | green | “because has no cause of action under bivens, we need not consider whether would be entitled to qualified immunity.” | 6 |
| 4 | Denise Mejia v. Wesley Miller | green | “arely if ever is the judiciary equally suited as congress to extend bivens even modestly.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.