2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Fibreboard Corp. v. Celotex Corporation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fibreboard Corp. v. Celotex Corporation Anchor | green | “every court that has expressly applied section 509(b)(2) has held that it excludes those who are primarily liable for the debt from subrogation because they received consideration for paying the debt.” | 13 |
| 2 | Pandora Industries, Inc. v. Paramount Communications Inc. (In Re Wingspread Corp.) | green | “the relevant question in the subrogation context is not simply whether the party was directly liable, but rather whether its payment was used to satisfy another's obligation.” | 13 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.