7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 35 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Lloyd Robl.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Lloyd Robl Anchor | green | “a court may rely on the information provided in the presen- tence report 'so long as it is well supported and appears reli- able.” | 5 |
| 2 | United States v. James Rogers | green | “a constructive amendment to an indictment oc- curs when either the government (usually during its presen- tation of evidence and/or its argument), the court (usually through its instructions to the jury), or both, broadens the pos- sible bases for conviction beyond those present…” | 5 |
| 3 | United States v. White | green | “applies to a victim's losses from the offense of conviction, which is narrower than relevant conduct under the guidelines” | 5 |
| 4 | United States v. Redman | green | “not all of the defendant's actions needed to be elaborate for the adjustment to apply; it is enough that, as the district court found, his actions when viewed as a whole constituted a sophisticated scheme.” | 5 |
| 5 | United States v. Medina-Mora | green | “the written judgment failed to capture accurately the unambiguous oral pronouncement,” | 5 |
| 6 | United States v. Rivera | green | “will not reweigh the evidence or invade the jury's province of assessing credibility and will overturn the verdict only if the record contains no evidence, regardless of how it is weighed, from which the jury could find guilt be- yond a reasonable doubt.” | 5 |
| 7 | United States v. Craig Klund | green | “would not affect his guidelines range” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.