7 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 35 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Henry v. Radius Global Solutions, LLC.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Henry v. Radius Global Solutions, LLC Anchor | green | “mere disagreement amongst courts over the interpretation of a statute does not render the statute unconstitutionally vague.” | 5 |
| 2 | Fraternal Order of Police v. Stenehjem | green | “a content-neutral and viewpoint-neutral opt-in provision like the one here limits the degree of government interference with first amendment interests.” | 5 |
| 3 | Fraternal Order of Police v. Stenehjem | green | “residential privacy is a significant government interest, particularly when telemarketing calls are flourishing, and becoming a recurring nuisance by virtue of their quantity” | 5 |
| 4 | Am. Ass'n of Political Consultants, Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n | green | “an fcc report revealed that more than 41 million borrowers owed over one trillion dollars in federal student loans. notably, student loan debt . . . is but one category of debt that is guaranteed by or owed to the federal government” | 5 |
| 5 | Am. Ass'n of Political Consultants, Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n | green | “in order to survive strict scrutiny, the government must show that the debt-collection exemption has been narrowly tailored to further a compelling governmental interest.” | 5 |
| 6 | Am. Ass'n of Political Consultants, Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n | green | “it is obvious from the text that the debt-collection exception's applicability turns entirely on the content of the communication-i.e. whether it is 'solely to collect a debt owed to or guaranteed by the united states.” | 5 |
| 7 | Velez v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. | green | “may exercise personal jurisdiction only to the extent permitted by the forum state's long-arm statute.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.