Topic: improperly reads a merits analysis into the limitations per… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #10925

7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 35 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from De'Angelo Cross v. United States.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 De'Angelo Cross v. United States Anchor
ca7 · 2018
green “improperly reads a merits analysis into the limitations period.” 10
2 United States v. Antonio Blackstone
ca9 · 2018
green “neither johnson nor welch mentioned the mandatory or advisory sentencing guidelines.” 5
3 Jerome Raybon v. United States
ca6 · 2017
green “we conclude that his claim is not timely under 28 u.s.c. 2255 (f)(3).” 4
4 United States v. Thilo Brown
ca4 · 2017
green “we are thus compelled to affirm the dismissal of petitioner's motion as untimely under 28 u.s.c. 2255 (f)(3).” 4
5 United States v. Greer
ca10 · 2018
green “mr. greer's interpretation of snyder would require this court to find that, no matter what the underlying claim, any petitioner can avoid aedpa's clear time limits simply by invoking a right newly recognized by the supreme court.” 4
6 De'Angelo Cross v. United States
ca7 · 2018
green “runs from 'the date on which the right asserted was initially recognized by the supreme court.” 4
7 United States v. Antonio Blackstone
ca9 · 2018
green “as of now, however, blackstone's motion is untimely.” 4

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check