6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 34 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Anderson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Anderson Anchor | green | “exclusionary clauses are construed even more strictly against the insurer than coverage clauses.” | 12 |
| 2 | Swire Pacific Holdings, Inc. v. Zurich Ins. Co. | green | “insurance contracts must be construed in accordance with the plain language of the policy.” | 6 |
| 3 | Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Beaver | green | “it has the burden of demonstrating that the allegations of the complaint are cast solely and entirely within the policy exclusion and are subject to no other reasonable interpretation.” | 5 |
| 4 | Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc. v. Mid-Continent Casualty Co. | green | “show either that a policy exclusion applies or that no coverage exists, no duty to defend arises.” | 5 |
| 5 | Stephens Ex Rel. Estate of Becker v. Mid-Continent Casualty Co. | green | “the duty to defend arises if the relevant pleadings allege facts that fairly and potentially bring the suit within policy coverage.” | 5 |
| 6 | Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Beaver | green | “that the allegations of the complaint are cast solely and entirely within the policy exclusion and are subject to no other reasonable interpretation” | 1 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.