5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 34 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Tamraz v. Lincoln Electric Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tamraz v. Lincoln Electric Co. Anchor | green | “require anything approaching absolute certainty.” | 9 |
| 2 | Tinna Dilts v. United Group Services, LLC | green | “permitted wide latitude in their opinions, including those not based on firsthand knowledge, so long as the expert's opinion has a reliable basis in the knowledge and experience of the discipline.” | 8 |
| 3 | Rodney Palatka v. Savage Arms, Inc. | green | “the trial judge has discretion in determining whether a proposed expert's testimony is admissible based on whether the testimony is both relevant and reliable.” | 7 |
| 4 | Brandy Andler v. Clear Channel Broadcasting, Inc | green | “indeed, rejection of expert testimony is the exception rather than the rule-the gatekeeping function established by daubert was never intended to serve as a replacement for the adversary system.” | 5 |
| 5 | Daniels v. Erie Ins. Grp. | green | “merely because the factual bases for an expert's opinion are weak.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.