6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 34 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Crystallex International Corp. v. Petróleos De Venezuela, S.A..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Crystallex International Corp. v. Petróleos De Venezuela, S.A. Anchor | green | “accept all factual allegations as true, construe the complaint in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, and determine whether, under any reasonable reading of the complaint, the plaintiff may be entitled to relief.” | 9 |
| 2 | In No. 85-5751 | green | “the classic context in which courts have collapsed multiple transactions for the purpose of assessing and finding fraudulent transfer liability.” | 5 |
| 3 | Hbe Leasing Corporation v. Frank | green | “this collapsing approach finds its most frequent application to lenders who have financed leveraged buyouts of companies that subsequently become insolvent.” | 5 |
| 4 | In re Owens Corning | green | “the cost of untangling them is so high relative to their assets,” | 5 |
| 5 | Giuliano v. Haskett (In re MCG Ltd. Partnership) | green | “accept all factual allegations as true, construe the complaint in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, and determine whether, under any reasonable reading of the complaint, the plaintiff may be entitled to relief.” | 5 |
| 6 | Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp Derivative Lit v. | green | “a court need not feel constrained to accept as truth conflicting pleadings that make no sense, or that would render a claim incoherent, or that are contradicted either by statements in the complaint itself or by documents upon which its pleadings rely, or by facts of which the c…” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.