2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 34 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Daniel F. Duane v. Michael P. Lane, James Thieret, Warden, James Buch and Daniel Cowen.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Daniel F. Duane v. Michael P. Lane, James Thieret, Warden, James Buch and Daniel Cowen Anchor | green | “something approaching a total unconcern for the plaintiff's welfare in the face of serious risks, or a conscious, culpable refusal to prevent harm.” | 18 |
| 2 | Herbert F. McGill Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Jack R. Duckworth, Defendants-Appellants/cross-Appellees | green | “functional equivalent of wanting harm to come to the prisoner.” | 16 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.